Vag shown in GHS yearbook photo

people are so dumb

your not going to see her cooter with her sitting down like that with her legs closed knee to knee. I believe it was a shadow that looked like something but infact wasnt.

oh come on! we dont know that for sure, let us have our hopes and dreams!

lol.

So from the comments I gather this girl has been with many guys, etc. etc.

She’s definitely a slut. I don’t like sluts.

lol ok then

we saw her cooter!

if u look really close u can see some… ask me how i know:rofl

Good talk:thumbup

If that’s not a shaddow, then she’s got a huge bush.

sooo how do we know her butts not a virgin :smiley:

Oh hai cp!!!

what are u, the pussy police?

looks shadowy to me.

Guess we don’t. lol.

well just send mcbitchin in first :rofl

bigger version

http://tinyurl.com/r4tazg

I feel like you can see a distinction of vag in that one…

HUSSY! TRAMP! FLOOZY!

i think it’s her two thighs touching…

She’s cute.

As for my opinion, now that I’ve seen the pic.

I don’t see any vag or pubic hair.

  1. The darkness is the shade from the dress covering that part of her body.
  2. There is no way she has no thighs. If she had no thighs, then that shady area would be her vag.

Again, she’s pretty fricken cute. I’m surprised she’s allowed to wear something like that to school though. My junior and senior year in school, girls had to wear stuff to the knee or lower. No spaghetti straps. The straps had to be at least two fingers wide. And no low cut shirts.

(Ravena Coeymans Selkirk class of 05)

Ooo I think I see a little somethin sumthin.

Again, she’s pretty fricken cute. I’m surprised she’s allowed to wear something like that to school though. My junior and senior year in school, girls had to wear stuff to the knee or lower. No spaghetti straps. The straps had to be at least two fingers wide. And no low cut shirts.

(Ravena Coeymans Selkirk class of 05)

I graduated the same year, and we had those rules in middle school only. :lol

we had no females at my school. CBA class of 08