it looks like a new mustang from the back taillight and panel.
[quote=“SilverGT,post:21,topic:37872"”]
it looks like a new mustang from the back taillight and panel.
[/quote]
no, it looks like a barracuda
I doubt thats a factory concept car. the interior, fog lamps and wheels don’t fit.
Yay another sporty automatic transmissioned car for old men!
It is sharp looking though.
agreed
[quote=“Garick,post:23,topic:37872"”]
no, it looks like a barracuda
[/quote]
Thank you. Also, those “gay” foglamps look pretty close to how the '70 wore them.
Machine flaunts widespread box of carbon: Rack and cell headlamps, rear panel, which is the site of fuel (between stop-ognyami) and spoiler on the edge of the luggage. CDs are also chosen by classical style, while hiding behind high Brembo brakes. Orange “fish” is the very concept of “Where”
I love translated sites. :lol:
Will probably end up just like the charger concept. Bad-ass, but they don’t make it :roll:
wow.
it’ll look great if they don’t deviate too much from the concept 
[quote=“kilaminjaro,post:7,topic:37872"”]
The ass end reminds me of the new mustangs for some reason
[/quote]
they look like s197 tails dont they. front ends looks just the early model
I like it but it needs a manual trans from New Process Gear like the original had!
its OK i guess…the interior is awful.
[quote=“TrueBlue,post:25,topic:37872"”]
Thank you. Also, those “gay” foglamps look pretty close to how the '70 wore them.
[/quote]
I know they are trying to be original here, but I think it would look better with a smooth front instead of the two lights poking out.
[quote=“JuicedGT,post:32,topic:37872"”]
its OK i guess…the interior is awful.
[/quote]
Really? You drive a 2000 Mustang. The interior in the 'Cuda is actually very similar to that in the miustang you drive. Clean, simplistic and functional. Granted its not much to look at, but it works for me.
[quote=“rj-92,post:35,topic:37872"”]
Really? You drive a 2000 Mustang. The interior in the 'Cuda is actually very similar to that in the mustang you drive. Clean, simplistic and functional. Granted its not much to look at, but it works for me.
[/quote]
actually, its a 99…and in my opinion, is way nicer than this.
meaning, my interior is 2 toned, its broken up, it has distinct characteristics. For a concept car, its very BLAH to me. Its doesn’t go with the whole “retro-ness”. Just too plain i guess…and its an auto. It looks comfortable and functional…just does not go with the car…
Look at an 05+ mustang…its a throw back inside and out…
they need to lose that gay thing in the center of the back of it. then it would lose its mustang look.
[quote=“Garick,post:23,topic:37872"”]
I doubt thats a factory concept car. the interior, fog lamps and wheels don’t fit.
[/quote]
It is a factory concept. It is a Chrysler built concept that is at SEMA.
In person, it is awesome!
[quote=“Rx3,post:26,topic:37872"”]
Will probably end up just like the charger concept. Bad-ass, but they don’t make it :roll:
[/quote]
most likely