what a piece of shit. I like how they are cell-phone quality pictures.
people are idiots.
what a piece of shit. I like how they are cell-phone quality pictures.
people are idiots.
Haha, 45k for a V6 chevy with no real interior and pictures taken with what appears to be a camera phone.
Shits weak.
Edit- Haha, redrum beat me by seconds.
[quote=“The_Russian,post:15,topic:27723"”]
what engine did they stick in that
[/quote]
In the pics they show a SBC maybe a 350, but in the description they say V6??
[quote=“01AudiS4,post:23,topic:27723"”]
In the pics they show a SBC maybe a 350, but in the description they say V6??
[/quote]
nooo,thats just a carb’d V6.(3.8 or a 4.3)
That thing is seroiusly constantly on ebay. I mean for the past few years, it pops up like once a month…
interior looks like ass crack
OK two things:
If it cost 125k to build why did they put a used engine with 40K+ in it and if its a “Lexus” why would you put a “reliable Chevy engine” in it.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
someone please go set it on fire.
[quote=“dawn,post:26,topic:27723"”]
Mad photoshopped?
[/quote]
What are you talking about??:roll2:
I prefer the Audi from IRobot
gross
[quote=“Bigronsaudi,post:28,topic:27723"”]
OK two things:
If it cost 125k to build why did they put a used engine with 40K+ in it and if its a “Lexus” why would you put a “reliable Chevy engine” in it.
[/quote]
If they spent $125k to build that, there has to be over $100k of blow stuffed in the body somewhere. Might not be a bad buy after all.
[quote=“redrum,post:34,topic:27723"”]
If they spent $125k to build that, there has to be over $100k of blow stuffed in the body somewhere. Might not be a bad buy after all.
[/quote]
$100k of blow was used while making of the car. The other 25k was for materials/labor.
LOOK its a 2054 Lexus that sounds like a 93 Blazer with a hole in the exhaust!!!