50 greatest muscle cars

PittSpeed Automotive PittSpeed Off Topic
1

50 FASTEST MUSCLECARS

YEAR/MODEL ET/MPH ENGINE HP TRANS GEAR SOURCE

1 1966 427 Cobra 12.20@118 427 8V 425 4-Speed 3.54 CC 11/65
2 1966 Corvette 427 12.8@112 L72 427 425 4-Speed 3.36 CD 11/65
3 1969 Road Runner 12.91@111.8 440 Six BBL 390 4-Speed 4.10 SS 6/69
4 1970 Hemi Cuda 13.10@107.12 426 Hemi 425 4-Speed 3.54 CC 11/69
5 1970 Chevelle SS454 13.12@107.01 454 LS6 450 4-Speed 3.55 CC 11/69
6 1969 Camaro 13.16@110.21 427 ZL1 430 4-Speed 4.10 HC 6/69
7 1968 Corvette 13.30@108 427 6V 435 4-Speed 3.70 HC 5/68
8 1970 Road Runner 13.34@107.5 426 Hemi 425 automatic 4.10 SS 12/69
9 1970 Buick GS Stage I 13.38@105.5 455 Stage I 360 automatic 3.64 MT 1/70
10 1968 Corvette 427 13.41@109.5 L72 427 425 4-Speed 3.55 CD 6/68
11 1969 Charger 500 13.48@109 426 Hemi 425 4-Speed 4.10 HR 2/69
12 1968 Charger 13.50@105 426 Hemi 425 automatic 3.23 CD 11/67
12 1970 Plymouth Superbird 13.50@105 426 Hemi 425 ? ? ?
14 1968 Road Runner 13.54@105.1 426 Hemi 425 automatic 3.55 CD 1/69
15 1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD 310 automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
16 1969 Corvette 13.56@111.1 427 L88 430 automatic 3.36 HR 4/69
17 1969 Super Bee 13.56@105.6 440 Six Pack 390 automatic 4.10 HR 8/69
18 1969 Boss 429 Mustang 13.60@106 Boss 429 375 4-Speed 3.91 HC 9/69
19 1970 Challenger R/T 13.62@104.3 440 Six Pack 390 automatic 3.23 CC 11/69
20 1970 Torino Cobra 13.63@105.9 429 SCJ 370 automatic 3.91 SS 3/70
21 1968 Biscayne 13.65@105 427 L72 425 4-Speed 4.56 SS 4/68
22 1964 Polara 500 13.70@107.37 426 4V 365 4-Speed 3.23 HC 2/64
23 1969 GTX 13.70@102.8 440 4V 375 automatic 4.10 MT 1/69
24 1969 Dart 440 13.71@105 440 4V 375 automatic 3.55 CC 5/69
25 1971 Road Runner 13.71@101.2 440 Six BBL 390 automatic 4.10 CC 1/71
26 1971 Cuda 13.72@106 440 Six BBL 390 automatic 4.10 SS 4/71
27 1971 Corvette 13.72@102.04 454 LS6 450 4-Speed 3.36 CL 8/71
28 1971 Super Bee 13.73@104 426 Hemi 425 automatic 4.10 MT 12/70
29 1968 Hurst/Olds 13.77@103.91 455 W-30 390 automatic 3.91 SS 8/68
30 1970 Hemi 'Cuda 13.78@101.2 426 Hemi 425 automatic 4.10 MT 9/69
31 1968 Firebird 13.79@106 400 HO 335 4-Speed N/A HR 3/68
32 1967 Corvette 13.80@108 427 6V 435 4-Speed 3.55 HR 5/67
33 1965 Catalina 13.80@106 421 6V ? 4-Speed 3.42 CD 3/65
34 1969 Super Bee Six Pack 13.80@104.2 440 Six BBL 390 automatic 4.10 CD 7/69
35 1971 Boss 351 Mustang 13.80@104 Boss 351 330 4-Speed 3.91 MT 1/71
36 1966 Satellite 13.81@104 426 Hemi 425 4-Speed 3.54 CD 4/66
37 1969 Coronet R/T 13.83@102.27 440 4V 375 4-Speed 4.10 SS 4/69
38 1968 Cyclone GT 13.86@101.69 428 CJ 335 automatic 4.11 MT 8/68
39 1969 Nova SS 396 13.87@105.1 396 4V 375 automatic 3.55 HR 7/69
40 1969 Shelby GT-500 13.87@104.52 428 CJ 335 4-Speed 3.91 SS 9/69
41 1969 Cyclone Cobra Jet 13.88@101.7 428 CJ 335 automatic 4.11 MT 1/69
42 1970 Olds 4-4-2 W-30 13.88@95.84 455 W-30 370 automatic 3.42 CC 11/69
43 1962 Corvette 13.89@105.14 327 FI 360 4-Speed 4.10 HR 1/62
44 1969 Barracuda 13.89@103.21 440 4V 375 automatic 4.10 SS 8/69
45 1962 Catalina 13.90@107 421 4V ? 4-Speed 4.30 MT 5/62
46 1969 Mustang Mach I 13.90@103.32 428 CJ 335 automatic 3.50 CL 3/69
47 1967 GTO 13.90@102.8 400 RA 360 automatic 4.33 CL 10/67
48 1970 Trans Am 13.90@102 400 RA 345 4-Speed 3.91 HR 2/70
49 1970 Torino Cobra 13.99@101 429 4V ? 4-Speed 3.91 MT 2/70
Legend: CC=Car Craft, CD=Car and Driver, CL=Car Life, HC=Hi Performance Cars, HR=Hot Rod, MCR=Muscle Car Review, MM=Mopar Muscle, MT=Motor Trend, SS=Super Stock

2

the gnx should be in the top 20 for 13.55 @104 mph stock

3

wow, that sucks.

Edit: I mean that all those cars are so slow.

4
5

muscle cars stooopid :smiley:

60’s 70’s

6

:redface: :embarass:

7

name all the japanese cars of that era that were faster

8

mike i hope your joking. do you realize that they did htose times on bias ply tires that werent no wider then 235 or so. give any of those cars some stickies and a decent driver and youll see a large difference. also those exhausts were very restictive. i think most of those cars had 2.25

9

if it doesnt have 4cyl’s and a turbo, it aint fast :rofl:

10

who said anything about Japaneese cars? Most of those cars would have got their asses handed to them by a stock LS1. I dont consider a stock LS1 to be all that fast, do you?

:dunno:

And yeah the bias ply tires did suck, but the trap speeds arent all that impressive either. Only a handful of the cars on that list top 110MPH.

And that was in an era of no emissions, leaded gas, and 400+ cubic inches.

11

those are cars from the 60’s and 70’s not car in present day time

12

I dont know how versed you are on muscle cars, but insurance is what made the manufactuers detune a lot of cars.

It was not uncommon to see people knocking off a few seconds by just rejetting/changing carbs, putting on headers, and going to stickier tires.

This is without touching the motor really. A lot of the Hemi cudas were dipping into the 10s, with just a few simple changes

13

:dunno:

14

well, lets put it this way… those cars would pick up much faster trap speeds with those simple mods

15

not all that hard to get a LS1 to pick up ~15mph either… :dunno:

16

yes and no.

I mean, an LS1 isnt gonna see 15mph increase with just headers/exhaust
a lot of those muscle cars were really choked down by the factory

17

mine only has a top end of 110mph !!!

also they were prolly all auto’s and had more low end torque than a friggin freight train

18

what does trap speed have to do with et???WAY TO MANY DIFFERANT THINGS CHANGE TRAP SPEED!!!1

19

while we’re at it, let’s name the cars from this era (american version) compared to today’s american cars.

Cobra
LS1
Z06
Viper

Vs.

Supra
3000GT
WRX
EVO

20

Suspention technology is another thing holding them back compared to today’s cars. You can’t compare an old muscle car to today’s muscle car(well you can, but it’s a waste of time :smiley: ).

My dad said his 61 impala with a 409 crossed the finish line still spinning the tires, i’m guessing that would hurt the trap speed.