However, throwing more and more money at the problem for the past 4 decades has only made the problem worse…so much for Hilary’s plan…
It’s not just throwing money though, if you want to read more about her, do some research. The above post only mentioned money
Oh…in that case, let’s get Pittspeed in the federal budget so we can research cars…we’ll spend the money here, it has to be a good idea. Tax everyone more…so some people can do an easy job that doesn’t actually produce anything…now that’s the way to build an economy.
This research eventually develops medicinal drugs for the public (against cancer/alzheimer’s/hypertension whatever), not just money spending. I am saying it serves a dual purpose you chooch! It’s not the only way to build an economy, I was just indicating that just because she doesn’t stand for what you want her to stand for, doesn’t mean her idea’s are bad.
How is Hilary’s plan good?
Do some research as I said above, if you are so inclined to know.
I have friends who can’t afford their cell phone bills, rent, or (insert item here). That doesn’t mean I should be taxed to pay for it. How about car insurance? Mine keeps going up because I get in accidents and drive too fast. I have an idea, the government should pay for it, because I can’t afford it. It would benefit all citizens…so it must be good.
Those friends are fiscally irresponsible. My friends have jobs and pay their ish on time, their jobs don’t offer 401k or Health Insurance is the difference. Your driving habits are personal, not what is best for everyone in mind.
Nope, people need to move the f&*% out of Pittsburgh until the leadership here is able to do something other than raise taxes every 3 months and still go broke.
Why? There is nothing wrong with PGH. Yeah, there are things that need to be improved, but so does every other place in the world
And what the hell is wrong with bringing our troops home from the foreign bases? Why don’t China, Japan, and Britain set up bases all around the world and maintain them until we get our debt under control. In fact they can put some on our soil too, that would be great…
I already answered this in another thread. There is nothing wrong with it. Predominately, we (USA) helps civilians in poor countries with socio-economic issues. They are part of the military, but doesn’t mean they are there to start a war, this isn’t Cuba we are talking about
Why do Americans think that our shit doesn’t reek as bad as the next country’s? Why is it ok for us to have bases there, but not ok for them to have bases here?
We aren’t a 3rd world country who needs help. Although, after the Catrina fiasco it makes me think twice. We have a national guard and other agencies that assist in these situations, unfortunately we already involved ourselves in a war we couldn’t really back out of, and the president chose to spend money on that instead of assisting the people in Ala, Miss, Louis, etc.