Bing, the news in your country is hilarious

I mean it makes complete sense. I’m unfortunately not a homeowner yet (hoping the market bubbles soon so I don’t have to pay 100-200K more than a house is worth) but the idea of moving to a more rural area is becoming more and more appealing to me. I live in FL currently, if I did leave FL it would be TX, mostly because I won’t move back somewhere that has state income tax.

1 Like

2 Likes

Mine is 2.3% but I only have 6 years left on it which is almost sad.

1 Like

i believe that.

it doesnt make sense to me how people take out those huge mortgages just to pretend to be rich.

I’ve spoken to dudes that have big job titles and nice salaries but $9k monthly mortgage payment for a mediocre home… at that math you pretty much cannot say no to the board (of directors) when they tell you to do ridiculous things.

1 Like

Who thought all those similar colors were a good idea for that graph?

1 Like

Canadians. They can’t even get that shit right.

Have to go to a UK site to get canadian news

1 Like

But the government told me it was climate change and passed a new tax to combat it?

2 Likes

Funny, but what’s a “jeet”.

it’s a reference to middle eastern people.

:neutral_face:

Google said it was in reference to Hindi persons? Isn’t the Middle East predominately Muslim?

it probably is just being used to refer to a particular skin color. I doubt this person is taking the time to determine the religion of the persons.

I remember being at UB in the computer labs and many of international students would eat their food with their hands right out of tupperware then proceed to type on all of the keyboards with their greasy ass fingers. Many did not wear shoes or had their 3 inch toe nails out in the open for us to all enjoy.

Fuck you UB, quit calling asking for donations. Eat my ass

1 Like

Is this legit?

well, it did happen, but i dont know that it will result in anything.

Bruce Pardy, a prominent Canadian constitutional scholar, told The Free Press: “The court correctly said that the government’s invocation of the Act relied on the statutory requirement for ‘threats or use of acts of serious violence.’ And there weren’t any.”