also, to get the price tag that low SSC is likely using off the shelf parts all over this car… probably tons of stuff off vettes, mustangs, nascar, pro-stock etc…
not a bad thing, but lends itself in favour of the veyron in terms of bassassity
id def take the ssc over the bugatti, it feels and looks like a much younger car, but the bugatti is still bad ass, its got maad balls and is still luxerious where the other seems to be pure sport, if i lived in a world where i could pick and choose without thinking financially id just have both, but for half hte price of either of these vehicles i could have a 7 second muscle car
forgot to add, but whatever happend to that koniseg car? if thats how its even spelled
Sorry… Bugatti was all downhill after the EB110-SS
Yuck.
These kinds of cars you REALLY have to see in person and drive before making any kind of judgement. I would honestly lean towards Ferrari/Lamborghini in many of these cases, at least those companies have the ingredients “just right”. Many of these supercars are just plain unlivable on the street, even if they are built well. Lots of sacrafices in the name of weight, and it’ll catch up with you in a hurry.
Id hold out for a 1300 hp car.
InB4misteroman$$$putsadepositdown.
meh, my penis is big enough. id be happy with a base corvette.
seriously though… 99.99999% of the people on here dont have the skills/experience to drive the aero at anything close to its limit anyway. even if you had the money, youll end up like the tards on the “M5 owned by oak tree” thread
brian
ick.
I mean I wouldn’t kick it out of bed, but no way would I consider a car like that even if it was well within my means.
i donno, i think they are pretty hot. but single color > two tone
