Camaro vs Mustang facepalm thread (split)

[LS_WS.6]

@dsblk93gt

I usually would defend a Mustang if half of it made sense, but neither of you make any sense.

But FYI I had the slowest model ever of a GT (according to the internet) being a 98 GT and ran 14.28@97.5 on a day with a 3550da. That is with 2.73 gears still. I don’t quite see a 3.8 Mustang running that. I know of way too many fast Mustang GTs, as much as I like Terminators that’s not the only fast Mustang. There are NA 4.6 SOHC making in the high 300’s na at the wheels with the new TFS heads.

As far as going fast for less $$? An LS1 takes less mods to make HP and the T56 or 4L60E is better than a GT has, but it has a lackluster rearend equal to that of a V6 Mustang.

I guess the same can be said about the new 2011 GT, more potential for going fast and handling than a new Camaro.

the n/a 4.6 TFS headed SOHC making high 300 wheel is not impressivce to us ls1/lsx fan boi moes tho.(or really to anyone or for any car snce now days standard seems to be 500wheel and even thats slow:Idiots) a cam only ls1 can easily 4-420 rwhp n/a, while not many but some do heads only and are at the 400 mark. now a GREAT combo of both head and cam only can put a ls1 at 480-500 whp. while fords have always had better rears and gm’s have not, stock rears have been into the 10s and better, some are freaks and hold lots of power, but i wil agree with the fact some cant even hold stock power