[quote=“ly555is,post:13,topic:37827"”]
i know… it’s like, plz throw gas mileage - a little of it - out the window and put a turbo in a little car. good fucking lord. imagine how much market would be out there. i would consider buying say, a turbo civic si if it was at least a 2.0.
christ. :tdown:
[/quote]
i get 26-30+ mpg on my turbo civic…1.9 liter turbo on 1000cc injectors…
[quote=“Viper966,post:7,topic:37827"”]
yep… no matter what though, its still a cobalt and owned by 90% 17 year old girls (no offense to the real enthusiasts out there, but you know its true)
[/quote]
ya but it really shows how over rated the NSX has been and will always be
[quote=“66impalass,post:22,topic:37827"”]
ya but it really shows how over rated the NSX has been and will always be
[/quote]
that car came out in 1991. other than 0.2 liters of displacement and some other body changes, it was basically the same car till it stopped production.
how many other “overrated” sports cars from 91 made it into the 2000’s basically unchanged?
yeah, real “overrated” heh.
That’s damn impressive for a factory front-driver, no matter who’s badges are on it.
Performance wars continue to heat up and the enthusiasts are winning. :tup:
[quote=“66impalass,post:22,topic:37827"”]
ya but it really shows how over rated the NSX has been and will always be
[/quote]
Technology advances, and time goes on. 50 years ago had you told someone that that the average family sedan would offer more power, and better handling than sports cars of the era they would have dropped their cup of tea, and laughed in your face.
That said the NSX is quite underpowered for category it’s classified as.
[quote=“Toda Party,post:23,topic:37827"”]
that car came out in 1991. other than 0.2 liters of displacement and some other body changes, it was basically the same car till it stopped production.
how many other “overrated” sports cars from 91 made it into the 2000’s basically unchanged?
yeah, real “overrated” heh.
[/quote]
How many sports cars beat it in 1991 and 2000, yes it was over rated.
just because it lasted that long does not mean it was a good car, it means honda was lazy
When you can get a better performing car for the more than and less than the car is over rated
I dont think NSX’s were overrated, they were however underpowered
[quote=“66impalass,post:27,topic:37827"”]
How many sports cars beat it in 1991 and 2000, yes it was over rated.
just because it lasted that long does not mean it was a good car, it means honda was lazy
When you can get a better performing car for the more than and less than the car is over rated
[/quote]
I’m w/ u on lazy, but i disagree; in 1991 it was top notch…by 2000 better shit had come out, and by 2003 or whenver the last year was, that is when it became overrated. Most people are blinded by the pricetag it carried, but aluminum isn’t cheap.
Anyway, its about time for the new nsx to come out, should be interesting.