I walked into a GM Dealership today to bs with them about the Cobalt SS. Right away everyone started getting hyped, they couldn’t wait to pop the hood and show me the supercharger…so when they popped the hood and opened it…i raised my eyebrows and dropped my mouth…
why is a Supercharger on a 2.0 L Engine? :down:
He went on to tell me that there were two cobalt ss engines…
a 2.4 L N/A Engine
and a 2.0 L Supercharged Engine.
I started to laugh :tool:
GM can’t even put a Supercharger on the bigger engine?
Engineers are retarded…I feel bad for the Cobalt SS now more than ever
the “phasing out” thing is just something i read somewhere… i’d look it up.
as for the saturn redline, i don’t think the Ion has much time left… it’s being replaced in a year or so. the build quality is abysmal… everything rattles, the one i drove had VISIBLE stripped screwheads, et cetera…
You have no idea what you’re talking about, huh? The 2.0L is more stout than the 2.4L from everything that I’ve read. Granted, it should’ve had a turbo on it rather than a S/C. There are two versions of the SS. There’s the SS Supercharged with the 2.0L 205 HP engine and the SS with the 2.4L 171 Hp engine. It’s sort of like the SRT-4 and the SRT design Neon.
you are retarded. you DO NOT have to take the supercharger off to change the oil or the filter. even thinking that makes me want to slap the living shit out of you. think a little before you post please for your sake.
Numbers are never WHP numbers (unless the car is purposely underrated). I agree that GM should’ve gone further, but there’s a ton more potential in that car than the TC. I can’t stand the wing or the wheels on the SS. The trunk is also useless.
The SRT design neon is for people who want to ugly up their regular neon by putting on an ugly front bumper and 1" chrome exhaust tips.