"First iPhone Pictures, I rule!!"

Yeah, I saw that but how many manufacturers claims hold true when it comes to battery life?

no it does not

i have the blackjack

Ooops…

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36847

iTrademarked!

Doh!

Igotfired because Ididntcheckfortrademarks

No iFCC Approval either…

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36856

cisco iTrademarking the iName was on the iNet forever ago. i was really iSurprised to see apple iNamed it the iPhone

EDIT: FCC approval doesn’t surprise me. if they had it FCC approved then it would have been public info. it will get approval i’m sure.

Insert duckets here.

duckets?

Never listened to Kid Rock, huh? Duckets = Bucks = Moola = Benjamins = Greeback = Dollars

no, not really much of a kid rock fan…thanks for clarifying. i really need to catch up on pop culture.

OH NOES!!!

Cisco Sued Apple today, this keeps getting better and better!!

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36866

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA :lol:

Got mine already :tup:

http://regmedia.co.uk/2006/12/18/linksys_wip320_1.jpg

that macworld conference is going on in my hotel in san francisco. no good freebies. :frowning:

looks pretty cool, but i’d wait until the price drops. i dont think i need to be carrying around a $600-$1k phone that is likely going to get dropped, possibly lost, etc.

cisco > apple
apple doesn’t stand a chance… all they have to do is integrate the technology and they can use the name though… wonder if stevey boi will allow it

Some more interesting things have developed…

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36945

Regardless of how the Cisco verdict goes, Apple still thinks it’s the big swinging dick in the room…

InB4someoneSlapsoneoftheseonEBAYwiththepicoftheappleone.