k, i fixed the one spelling error on the first line and read it out loud, (thats what ur supposed to do when proof reading something that will be read out loud). I am at a loss for words. I honestly think you are just avoiding a comeback.
I’m glad that all you fucks think this is funny shit. The hell are you goin to do when 2000 people lose there jobs in Buffalo?
Correct ones anyway. :rimshot:
I’m not going to do anything, actually.
Okay, here’s my problems with it, in true middle-school teacher form.
-“Once again,” should be capitalized, as should all other words that start sentences in this paragraph.
-You need to capitalize all instances of “I,” including in “I’ve,” which needs an apostrophe, since it’s a conjunction, as is “can’t,” since “cant” describes the tilt of something.
-The word “re-read” should be hyphenated.
-You were right, you spelled “rebuttal” incorrectly.
-If you’re going to type the word “Oh,” make sure you don’t forget the ‘h.’
(1) No, the post still was not readable, because, in addition to the hardly exhaustive list of stylistic errors, you jump all over the place and don’t take the time to fully flesh out a point before getting distracted by something else.
(2) No, I’m not using your grammar as an excuse, because I have only the slightest idea what you’re trying to argue. I understand that you think the free market is the ultimate economic good, but I haven’t seen why, other than subjective value judgments. You haven’t responded to my general theory that a hybrid system is better if it improves the overall quality of life of the people within the system, which is actually based on some rational considerations.
(3) I don’t care about your degree if you can justify what you’re claiming, but you haven’t done anything but make assertions as of yet.
(4) I don’t care if you’re an asshole, because I am too, whether or not you properly format your response, if I disagree substantially with you, and you cannot or will not provide rational grounds for your beliefs.
(5) I will not respond to your post on the previous page until it’s formatted well enough to get you through middle school (that was the irony of your post, you said that people who can’t understand what you’re writing should try graduating middle school again, but I’m pretty sure that if you submitted work like that, you wouldn’t pass middle school English).
Probably get another raise, since I was smart and moved the fuck out of NY. :grouphug:
Here’s my point:
Try it like that.
Or even better:
steal the money in their bank accounts
Holy shit u still wont respond. I am to belive u cant read it because certain words arent capitalized? wow
No, I’m not going to waste my time reading anything that’s that annoying to read. Just like if I hear someone speaking in a retard accent about astrophysics, I don’t stop to consider their opinion; if I see someone typing like a 12 year old who just got AOL, I automatically disregard their opinions on everything but current events in Dragonball Z.
Maybe I’m spoiled by being a member of Something Awful for years, where they ban people who don’t know how to type.
:drama2:
I can’t wait for the airline bailout thread to fire up!
looks like we arent gonna get anywhere here…i wont lose any sleep
Good plan.
FWIW, post #453 is the best post in this thread. :thankyou:
Looks retarded and sounds retarded are two different things, Fry. :roflpicard:
Good call though, I couldn’t have set that joke up better had I tried.
:lol: :highfive:
Just to add fuel to the fire…
Perhaps GM bondholders are secretly trying to get GM to go bankrupt…
Apparently, a fair amount of GM’s non-secured credit was insured against default by - you guessed it - AIG. And bankruptcy counts as a default on the loan/bond. And as the government said it would honor AIG’s credit-default contracts, the government would be on the hook for any bankruptcy - for the full amount of the loan.
Therefore, the bondholders make out better when GM goes bankrupt than if they settle for stock swaps (pennies on the dollar), or negotiate anything down.
And the clot thickens.
Not inconceivable.