Who is in the Militia ? During the drafting of the consitution, it was 16-60.
There were standing Army’s then. Why would every man have to be part of a military force, if we had an army?
During the drafting of the Constitution there was barely any standing army due to the fact that it could not be financed. Many of the problems that happened after the war had to do with debt, we could not afford a regular army like the ones England and France regularly had. In fact we owed substantial amounts of money to the soldiers who fought in the war. How could we have a substantial standing army if we could not pay the men who have already fought?
Did the British, who were our rulers try to force us to do things we didn’t want to via threat of death?
No they didn’t in fact it wasn’t until Lexington and Concord with the arrest warrants of Sam Adams and John Handcock that we felt actually threatened. Even after Lexinton and Concord many were calling for an end to hostilities on both sides.
Did we stop this with our own firearms?
Yes we did use a lot of our own firearms, except for artillery
So we took arms against our governing body when they stopped caring about us, and then we created a new government. This new governmet was spelled out, and the first change to it we gave ourselves a formal group of people (formal as in age, regulated during the times of the BOR ment “trained” not made illegal by laws) that should always be ready to take up arms?
If you want to get technical, the states under the Second Amendment reserve the right to have their own militias, to be financed by themselves, this however could not be used to wage war as that is a right reserved for the executive and legislative branches of the federal government only in the defense of the state by either domestic rebellion or outside invasion.
These creators of our government made men be part of this group so we could shoot targets on formal gun ranges, kill deer during hunting season, and for other “sporting purposes”.
No, while hunting was obviously a major part of life back then, that was not their chief concern, they wanted to make sure that no future legislation by the state or the federal government could prohibit the right to own firearms.
With that said it should also be noted that the firearms that existed at the time were at best only to be shot 3 times a min, not the hundreds of rounds a min that is capable by a fully automatic weapon. Gun related crimes during colonial times were scarce do to the fact that the weapons were cumbersome
Oh, I hear MSNBC is giving away free koolaid too.
I’m not a fan of MSNBC, with Rachel Maddow now having her own show this network has become nothing more than the liberal equivalent of FOX, I’ll stick to my CNN and BBC thank you.