Just dyno'd 440WHP - 2003 Evo

[Art]

@Shawn96VR-4

Whoa. Calm down princess.

First of all, I gave the car props so I am not sure why you got your panties in a bunch. Friggin prissy Evo owners.

Second of all, Mustang dynos are NOTORIOUSLY unaccurate as they are low. They do not reflect the actual traps. That’s not a dig at your car but just the dyno in general. My point was that you go to a dyno for 2 reasons: Get #s, tune your car. I recommended going to a dyno that is REPEATABLE and ACCURATE in regards that the #s you get represents what traps you would get (Again, typically that isn’t a Mustang dyno). If it’s not accurate (ie reads high/low), it doesn’t matter if it’s repeated so you can make changes to hardware/tune and see the difference.

P.S. I can’t dyno 440WHP unless I change WG springs.
P.S.S The DJ I went on was dead on was not the over inflated DJ #s that the masses seem to expect. But, who cares?

Sorry for the hate last post, had some buddies over and we had a few… Maybe I took it wrong, went overboard and played a little rough.

Its just that I’ve always heard the opposite of what you are telling me - I’ve heard Mustangs are more consistant/accurate among themselves and Dynojets almost always produce over-inflated numbers.

I guess since you know nothing about the CBRD Mustang dyno and I know nothing of your dynojet… we cant critisize each other on who has a more accurate dyno? Evo’s with my WHP on this dyno typically do 125 - 130MPH 1/4.

I think I met you about 6 or 7 years ago at the lot… I had a black 1.8T Jetta and you had a Green VR-4 that had just run 11’s?

• Princess