I requested a walk through in the letter terminating our lease, but he never scheduled one.
He didn’t waive anything, he added $25 a month to our rent because we had 2 cats-which he allowed and was in the lease.
This is what I was confused about, I saw a website that claimed he could not counter sue us for damages if we only sued for the amount of security deposit. It said that if we sued for double the amount, he could counter sue for damages.
I think I will send him a certified letter stating that I am not going to pay these damages and that I want our security deposit back within one week or I will file a suit. Of course I will include a copy of the landlord tenant act just in case he thinks I’m stupid.
This is my plan, if I still don’t get our money back I will go to the magistrate. However, this section of the landlord tenant act has me a bit perplexed:
(c) If the landlord fails to pay the tenant the difference between the sum
deposited, including any unpaid interest thereon, and the actual damages to the leasehold
premises caused by the tenant within thirty days after termination of the lease or surrender and
acceptance of the leasehold premises, the landlord shall be liable in assumpsit to double the
amount by which the sum deposited in escrow, including any unpaid interest thereon, exceeds
the actual damages to the leasehold premises caused by the tenant as determined by any
court of record or court not of record having jurisdiction in civil actions at law. The burden of
proof of actual damages caused by the tenant to the leasehold premises shall be on the
landlord.
So, since he is saying we owe him $16XX or so more than the security deposit, doesn’t this mean that we would not be entitled to any of our security deposit?