Thanks. It’s less than I thought we’d do once opening up the intake and exhaust, but not too bad for NA.
Again, thanks! Let him call BS, it made the #s (and those are SAE corrected as well).
Thank you sir. And we haven’t even done every trick in the book. It’s running a pretty heavy twin-disc clutch, it’s still using a standard water pump (the electric water pumps don’t cut it on the road course), it’s a streetable cam, etc. I’m happy with the #s.
It didn’t make it out Sunday. 
Last minute prep on Sat it sprung both oil (there’s about a billllllion fittings) and fuel leaks. My builder hopes to have 'em tracked down and fixed by the Test 'n Tune this week (Thurs night I think). I’m back in Durkastan so I won’t even be able to see it run.
The stock Ti is known to be pretty damn good for the small size of the piping. However, back to back dyno results usually show 10rwhp on stock cube heads/cam motors, and 15+ on big cube motors. The 85mm MAF also shows pretty good restriction on big cubes. That’s why I was really expecting more than the 610rwhp. I honestly think we’ve just run up against the limit of the LS-style intake. A big single plane or sheetmetal intake on this car would be dope, and a ITB setup would be just titty. However, it already makes enough power for a road course car, I don’t want a ghey hood, and I’m happy with it.
Nice, maybe on the n2o you’ll make as much power as I do NA. 
J/K get that thing on the street and get a real 1/4 # for it too! It should be quick if you put a good tire on it.
-TJ