If you dont have the compression or power adder need for that extra octane, it wont do any more good and could make you slower, just to keep that in mind. Higher octane = less combustible
Thats a lie, especially on forums where there is a search option. Granted it hasn’t been discussed here but wueva.
In both of my SHOs I have to run at least 91 octane which blows. Some run fine on 87, some on 89… others straight 91, etc. I run 93/94 depending on if I go to Sunoco or not. Basically, they both run like shit with anything lower. If you plan on racing, you don’t want to gas up at all unless its the bare minimum. Less weight and mass that will move when the car does. And I mean it more like, liquid doesn’t just move with the car but bounces around in the gas tank and thats some mass thats moving with and against the car. At 8lbs a gallon, thats like 100lbs you could shave just by running a quarter tank or somethin’
Just wait until you calculate your mpg for each kind of driving, fill up a bit each day and figure out how far you want to drive that day so that you end up with the right amount of gas that night…you arent there yet
True, keep forgetting that. On the ride back from Wisconsin I filled up with 94 in Indiana at a Sunoco, around here it tops at 93. Good call sir. :tup:
Yea the additive that got it to 94 got the big no-no from NYS I guess. As long as it isnt a slippery slope to get us down to cali’s 91 max, I’m ok with it
i use 89 all the time, every once in awhile i’ll put in 91 or 93
its recommended to use 89 with my engine… and i figure with the bolt-ons the 91 or 93 wouldnt hurt