You don’t think Bush was tested (and failed by the way) during 9/11 on internation matters?
It was a stupid comment by Biden lets not blow it out of proportion.
[quote=“StrokedZ28,post:2001,topic:41192"”]
You don’t think Bush was tested (and failed by the way) during 9/11 on internation matters?
No, he was definitely tested, and passed with flying colors in the immediate response and rallying the nation. He fucked it up after we charged into Baghdad and didn’t have a plan.
Exactly, I even wrapped my comment with laughing smilies, but people had to go and get all serious. Anything anti-obama is srs bsns man. You can’t even post a joke without it ended up on his anti-smears site. :roll2:
Meh. We bask in the afterglow of Palin’s fuckups. Time to take our medicine.
“Ladies and Gentlemen, I GUARANTEE you that there will be a major disaster within months of Obama taking the White House! WHOOO!!! Whooo! Whoo? cricket”
:picard:
Yeah post #2000. :awdrifter:
:tif: His day 1 reaction was piss poor (7 minutes, plus his first address to the nation was HORRIBLE); he didn’t get in front of the issue until the ground zero appearance and the SOTU
hahah Bush told us to go out and shop, good reaction
Put away all you left wing hate and watch his speech again from 9/11.
Say what you want about how he’s fucked up since, but that was a masterfully delivered speech when a nation was in need.
gotta agree with jason on this
OK I just watched cbs evening news and McCain says he wants to cap small business tax at 35% and cut corp. tax to 25%. Ummmmm what?
Again I saw Obama saying he wants to cut capital gains tax on small business. Ummm what?
Oh, and barney Frank says ,"Now is the time for government spending."WTF?!?
:picard:
You’re right that was good, his FIRST conference on 9/11 sucked balls (he was standing if that provides any reference)
Who is going to start the sticky thread blaming Bush for EVERYTHING for the next four years(or 400 years)?
You might as well get the ball rolling now.:gotme:
if the shoe fits…
Exactley, the Bush Administration will go down as one of worst in history. It will take years to repair the damage left by this man.
Well there has been some talk about the money the RNC is spending to make Sarah Palin look good. While I think its a bit much and make the everyday “hockey-mom” look a little hypocritical there are far more pressing matters concerning Sarah Palin that should take center stage.
So in that I agree with Campbell Brown on this one.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/22/campbell.brown.looks/index.html
Red numbers? Ohhhh nooooooos!!! (There were none before)
http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-pres-ge-mvo.php
The Buffet News reported McCain closing the gap on PAGE A7.:bloated:
I don’t. The question she raises is why should it matter that we talk about women’s clothing vs mens… That is a completely different and valid accusation.
But that’s not the point here. McCain and the Repubs would like to spin it that way. The point is the feckless spend of 150K on a wardrobe. Especially in these hard times. For all McCain’s talk about wasteful spending, “pork” it seems they do it themselves. They mocked the $400 haircut. Well we can mock the $150k wardrobe. Seems even to me.
I agree with the hypocracy, but since I thought mocking a $400 haircut was dumb I also think this is dumb. But again I agree with the hypocracy, I just don’t think its as newsworthy as the networks claim.
her haircut is $3,200
I was referring to john Edwards. 3200, right… And that surely qualifies her to speak to the ’ hockey moms’ and ‘joe six packs’ out there in real ‘proAmerica’.
Source?
news.google.com, search Palin wardrobe. Expenses disclosed in RNC campaign fund reports.