«OFFICIAL» Dyno Leaderboard 2011-2012

^^^ Nice, BUT if we’re going to do this I’m not going to look at charts and guess what your numbers are!

Can everyone agree with corrected #'s, writing out the HP and TQ and posting an actual graph?

His numbers are on the list on the 1st page.

398/397 turbo

http://i.imgur.com/LQGk1.jpg

^^^^^^ Matt, that powerband is pretty killer…

509/475

i think i am like 400 horsepower

Uncorrected on my ass dyno! please add me

This thread makes me want to buy a cam.
and feel like my car makes no power haha.

Yea, it really is. Marts car pulls like fuck from like 2000 rpm all the way.

Those are badass numbers Brian!

I can jump up 6 or 7 spots with my 150 shot lol

I put the data into a simple diagram above. Choda stands out with those TQ numbers :tup:

I need to get on a DynoJet and help my e-confidence.

I would like to see what kind of car each person has on the list but I know nobody cares what I think. :slight_smile:

Who leads in AWD?

The graph looks good… Chodas TQ :lol:

That chart makes my torque look sick

I can put more info on the chart but it gets cluttered quick.

---------- Post added at 01:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 PM ----------

I just realized I skipped Happy240sx since his numbers were exactly the same as XwalkerX’s!

And I left out those who didn’t have TQ figures too.

I believe Psphinx

I can’t wait to see what the ws6 does with a 300 shot :wink:

you should make it a "pump gas chart (no e85 thats cheating) and a race gas chart

Nah, we’ll keep this as basic as possible. 1 diagram, most power you can squeeze out.

Comparing numbers from one day vs. another is bad enough. Comparing numbers from one dyno to the next is a joke. You can have massive variation between dynos, WAY beyond the difference from one proper 1/4 mile track to the next. I’ve seen a difference of over 25% in some cases.

To make matters worse, the Land and Sea dyno I’ve tuned on in Rochester during traveling tuning read 5-25% higher than our dyno depending on the pull. The numbers were not consistent/repeatable despite the car being consistent (as we verified on a Dynojet in Rochester), making the first dyno useless for tuning or comparison to other vehicles.

There’s another prime example, because people that have dyno’d on Evan’s Dynapak make almost 20% less on our Mustang. The Mustang dyno Saxon mentioned is probably set up to read high.

We did it for a customer’s bragging rights once. 674 whp on the dynojet, 549 on our dyno. I didn’t touch the tune or boost level.

Dynos are for tuning. Tracks are for racing. We chose the dyno that works best for tuning.