Who cares?
Nobody is winning any award for being #1
Anyone who is tired of seeing people being totally mislead and misinformed by car forums that people read to try and learn about cars.
So basically Innovative has the only dyno with correct numbers in the area :lol:
Seriously?
This forum has people from all over the area it’s obviously not possible to send all the business to you.
You don’t like the thread? Ok don’t add numbers from your cars and move on the rest of us were enjoying the thread for some comparison.
Should we add disclaimer about percent error? would that make you happy?
Weird your comment about the land and sea dyno I have seen multiple cars including my own dyno different days producing the same numbers with repeatable/consistent results.
im supercharged if you wanna update it haha
so lemme get this right, the land and sea dyno you used was reading 5-25% higher? which is it? when i dynod my car and every single other car its ben repeatable to within 5whp. maybe you had a bad experience and maybe the shop you went to had there dyno setup to read high. any dyno operator can set up a dyno to read high. So to sit here and pretend like land and sea dynos read high is just rediculous especialy when you know it can be minipulated. I realy dont appreciate the cheap shot your trying to take at me. I can go on and on about why mustang dyno’s suck but i wont. please educate yourself on the matter at hand first. thank you.
double post
I never said we have the only accurate dyno. Mustang, Dynojet, Dyno Dynamics and Dynapak can all produce repeatable results when properly operated and maintained. The issue is they all read differently so you cannot compare numbers between them without it being misleading.
Since this is a penis measuring contest you might as well measure your penises with rulers that are all different sizes so a 10" one on ruler X is a 6" one on ruler Y. A willing female will be able to tell you that it’s the same penis regardless of what the different rulers say. LOL
so lemme get this right, the land and sea dyno you used was reading 5-25% higher? which is it? when i dynod my car and every single other car its ben repeatable to within 5whp. maybe you had a bad experience and maybe the shop you went to had there dyno setup to read high. any dyno operator can set up a dyno to read high. So to sit here and pretend like land and sea dynos read high is just rediculous especialy when you know it can be minipulated. I realy dont appreciate the cheap shot your trying to take at me. I can go on and on about why mustang dyno’s suck but i wont. please educate yourself on the matter at hand first. thank you.
It was 5-25% higher. I clearly stated that the dyno wasn’t repeatable.
You’ve missed the whole point of my post, which is that dynos read different from one to the next. Our Mustang dyno reads lower than Cobb’s. Your dyno probably reads different from other ones of the same brand too.
I didn’t take a shot at anyone, but if anyone could take it that way it would be the shop in Rochester with the dyno I’m talking about.
This. I thought.
Dan
Good thread!!
I enjoy comparing the dyno numbers here with the trap speeds posted on the other thread.
For comparison I trapped 142mph with about 570whp on Mikes mustang dyno, the car has made 605whp at a higher boost level then we have yet to run at the track on. Just waiting to be able to run my MT slicks on the car for that level of power.
Im hoping to be around 146 mph trap speed at the 605 level
Oh just for reference the car weighs around 3400 lbs with me in it ha ha ha ha …just one of my other pet peeves (people lying about the weight of their cars)
ok ok
2680 with me in it LOL
Im thinking Emery’s car should dyno at around 850 to 950 whp on a mustang to trap 166mph
If memory serves me correctly AMS evo trapped at 171 mph at 1142whp on a dynojet which would be around 15% to 18% higher then a mustang in my experiances with the dynojet up here in Toronto.
I believe Emery’s car dyno’d just shy of 850.
i agree with inn-tune to some degree, although he is making it out like his mustang dyno is meant to read low? why would you make your dyno read high or low? I mean its meant to make repeatable pulls so that you can tune the vehicle… mustangs and dynapacks are great for tuning, dyno jets are great for dyno days
People are taking this way to seriously.
It’s for fun.
Im @ 110hp lol. So i think i should win the dyno graph ecock contest. Since i only have .6 litres. if i had an 8 cylinder i would be shitting all over everyone with like 1100 hp 
lol. yeah suck it donovan ! i win!
I’m just impressed with choda’s TORX
Mine is bigger
srsly though I can’t believe the shit some of you people will debate.
638 whp and 670 torque. Dyna Pack
523 whp and 487 torque Dynamnic dyno
LOL pick whichever number you want.
Made 494 rwhp, 464 torque Sae corected on Spina’s dino. I would post the graph but its on disc.
08 mustang , Procharged.
Fixed
I will take my rightful place at the bottom of this list thank you…this was on TuboCiv’s dyno
256HP/276TQ [small] Turbo
2011 MazdaSpeed3
I’ll add more numbers soon and since it’s close to the end of the season I won’t be super picky about SAE numbers, etc. BUT you guys at LEAST need to give me both HP and TQ numbers to get on the diagram.
It’s confusing because Horsepower is a unit of measure and people expect it to be consistent like an inch or a mile, but that’s not the case.
We didn’t make it do anything. We calibrate it as the manufacturer intended. However, a large percentage of dyno operators DO make their dynos read higher on purpose, which ends up making ours read lower than theirs. For example, it’s common for Dyno Dynamics operators to use a 1.13-1.2 correction factor on all graphs to make them read higher like Dynojets. As another example, Dynojets always read higher than Mustang Dynos unless the Mustang dyno operator has manipulated the dyno to make it read higher like a Dynojet. There’s a shop in CT that played with the software and thinks they’ve added about 15% to their Mustang dyno which gets it a bit under a Dynojet, but I don’t feel there’s even an accurate way to do that. At the end of the day it can disrupt accurate loading when you throw these numbers off so we just don’t do it.
There’s a difference from one dyno to the next, then a greater difference between dynos of different brands, further compounded by the way the operator sets the software.
All our numbers are SAE corrected (accounts for atmospheric conditions) for reference.
What mods do you have?
Did you do more than one pull? If yes, what were the other numbers?