OK... JoesTypeS.... YOU WIN. (watches... yeah, yeah...)

[Final_GTS]

@Joe

seriously, thats a hot looking watch, but reading an analog watch without numbers is way too much effort. if i look at my $10 timex, i know it’s 4:32 in .1 of a second. If i look at that, i have to guestimate where the 5 is, compared to 4 and 6, then read halfway past, WAY too much effort.

LOL… reminds me of the George Carlin skit;

“Have you ever looked at your watch, and didnt know what time it was? So you look again- and you STILL dont know what time it is? So you look a third time, and you still dont? Why the fuck do we do that?!?”