Then kill him.
You’re confusing me with RP. It’s OK, happens all the time, but you’ve gotta pick who you’re accusing of being inconsistent. As of the day we shot him in the face, no we shouldn’t have shared our intel. By then we must have known that we couldn’t trust the Pakis farther than we could throw them. I think sending in the SEALS for the headshot was justified. That’s my view.
---------- Post added at 11:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:10 AM ----------
Orrrrrr… Maybe they were cooperating and hooked us up with the intel that he was staying where he was, and said “Hey we’ll tell you where he is, but you’ve got to come get him so we can make it look like we’re being good muslims and not in bed with the west.” :eyebrow:
No, I’m not. RP made both statements I posted. One was from the article I linked, the other was from the one you posted. He can’t have it both ways. Either you trust them enough to let them do your dirty work, or you make the same call Obama did and take Osama out without involving the Pakistanis.
I like a lot of what Paul has to say but things like this show me I don’t want a guy like him in charge of our national security. It bothered me to say I was impressed that Obama made the call he did. Luckily team Obama entirely fucked up the post game show so I was able to go back to not liking them again. 
lol :tup:
Either way we shot bin laden in the face. At this point I don’t really care about the politics of it.