^shouldn’t you and applesauce be spooning right now. its sunday morning
and I disagree with your comments.
about 80G vs 80G
Also then everyone would have an Sr hahah nvm.
Even my mom knows what a sr is…
That’s fine, some day you’ll realize that you always get what you pay for. That and the fact that real automotive engineers know a thing or two about cars that we don’t. But if you believe that for 80k you can build a better car than the GT-R, then feel free to prove me wrong. I may not have the 80k to drop on one, but there would be no hesitation if I did.
who’s talking about a 80G GTR35, that GTR will be the high bar other cars will be measured by,
cause I’m not, there are a lot of cars under 80G that don’t deliver vs. other cars.
http://www.autospies.com/news/The-129-000-Nissan-GT-R-Price-Gauging-on-new-Nissan-GT-R-26091/
try 130G USD$$
consider this at $80G USD
http://www.cadillac.com/cadillacjsp/model/landing.jsp?model=stsv&year=2008
Cars buyers are so pathetic.
That STS-V website has a list of good things about the car and one of them is “High Performance Rear Wheel Driver System” HAHAHAAH WTF???
Are you seriously comparing a Cadillac to a GT-R?
no I am showing an 80G car… for example… which the GTR is not, despite MSRP
Value is subjective, not objective. There are people out there that would rather have the Caddy. How good or bad of a value a vehicle is, is determined solely by what you want out of it, and how well it performs that function for the amount you pay.
I agree with Solarian. That’s the difference between a hooker and a girlfriend.
Agreed, hence why I was questioning the comparison. The cars are in completely different classes, and the sts-v was never a great car. The cts-v, however, is pretty much rape.