I will be moving next summer and will not be in a situation to have a fun car for at least a few years after that. I want something that will last me, and not need costly repairs.
I am leaning towards a well maintained Subaru wagon simply because of AWD will be much appreciated considering I will be in Vermont, and the storage space will come in handy.
Now on to my real question…
I am a big fan of MT cars, and have always preferred them, but I am leaning away from a MT for this car simply because I don’t want to have to worry about an expensive clutch replacement on a used car.
How are Subaru auto transmissions? Do they last a long time? Reliable? Is it worth the possibly higher initial cost, and less vehicle control in snow to not have to worry about the clutch needing replacement?
No clue on the autos, but I have 91k on the original clutch on my WRX wagon with moderate use here still grabs great. As long as the prior owner didn’t sit there doing launches, or roasting it at stop-lights I could see it lasting an extremely long time before replacement.
Unless a previous owner of my RS chimes in (wicked civy or eclipsed), as far as I know mine is still on the original clutch at 150k miles and doesn’t slip at all.
From what I hear STi/Wrx transmissions can take a lot of abuse and only go after a lot of beating on them/redline drops, etc.
every single vehicle with an automatic transmission I’ve ever owned has had the transmission fail. I’ve only blown up one manual.
[/quote]
lets tally my history with automatics. +1 on my 88 taurus and +4 on my turbo SHO (3 of them were on bone stock power) My saturn one is on the way out as well.
buying a automatic because they are less to maintain is a mistake IMO. a clutch job is WAY cheaper than a rebuilt automatic every few years (or every year in my case)
The clutch in the Legacy and Legacy Outbacks are rock solid. Buddy in Rochester is on the original and he is close to 100k, I am at 40k on mine and it’s in great shape.