That’s the most conditional thing I’ve ever heard. A lot of cars underbodys drop a lot lower then the aero making it appear not as low. A lot of older bmws are like this like e24 hangs really low underneath. What’s lower an e24 with frame rails 1" off the ground and bumpers 5" off the ground flushing 17s? Or an s14 with aero 1" off the ground and frame rails 4" flushing 18s? Definitely the BMW (although I’d rather have the Nissan lol)
And the wheel size thing you already know is silly. All cars are totally different so that’s not even remotely comparable. If I were to tuck an 18 on my q, the car would be laying on the ground. Tuck a 17" tire on an eg and shit ain’t low at all lol My point is it’s totally dependent on too many things.
My post isnt directrd at anyone just hellabored at work lol but low cars shouldn’t be taken very seriously it’s really all in good fun IMO. And static vs bags is really personal preference. I’ll roll static daily until my bones can’t take it anymore. Having said that I will probably get bags as soon as I can afford because I am getting pretty sick of this shit lmao. I still say if you can put up with it more power to you. Better fitmnent while rolling, easier tuning, stiffer ride at low heights, huger pain in the ass etc. When I’m older my daily will either be 4x4 status or on air but for now it’s fun/funny riding low, slow and stupid
My truck was on bags and it was 100x more uncomfortable than my m3 lol thing sucked though
