I received a strange email to my .edu address today. There is a bit of activity on the web with people trying to figure it out. Has anyone else had this delivered to them or have any info on it?
It was also sent to a number of other .edu addresses. This seems to be the MO.
fromPaulo Acoba <pacoba@ucmerced.edu>tointelliant@gmail.com
cckwheele7@utmem.edu,
J.L.Helm@iup.edu,
mgranado@email.arizona.edu,
nw213308@ohio.edu,
holden.65@osu.edu,
mary-iber@uiowa.edu,
kgh5013@psu.edu,
brumfield69@marshall.edu,
nricker@utk.edu,
crissie3@ku.edu,
bwilhite@mednet.ucla.edu,
eva-adderley@uiowa.edu,
lewis.813@osu.edu,
barham@mailplus.wisc.edu,
anwe0002@umn.edu,
bartus@iastate.edu,
kel5006@psu.edu,
rstrecker5@hotmail.com,
jpfenski@buffalo.edu,
mmyrdac@ilstu.edu,
lk190308@ohio.edu,
allisonmousseau@vandals.uidaho.edu,
geldis.3@osu.edu
dateSun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:03 PMsubjectRe: The guiltiest coward’s predictionssigned-bygmail.com
hide details 1:03 PM (9 hours ago)
Reply
Did you guys get this email??? What does this mean?!?! All I can grasp is that he was upset about his attempt at a
maritial union?
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:46 AM, <intelliant@gmail.com> wrote:
Interested in looking for somebody who shares your way of thinking? If not, there’s no
need to read further as it means that people who think just like you
already surround you.
You must want have every intention to compel every person to think your way.
Or do you prefer to promote idiocy?
I was attempting to get married this year because it would have increased the tax refund.
They told me a marital union should be about love.
They had no excitement for working together.
They applaud the idea of finding what you enjoy doing. They’re deceiving themselves.
Maybe five per cent of today’s GDP would suffice to live comfortably.
People ask how I survive because I’m often unemployed.
I ask them why they reward skillful beguilers by spending money on Hollywood.
Why do they aspire after big vehicles and private property?
Aren’t they aware that they’re crazy about traveling only as long as
it’s highly regarded by the mainstream?
They’re positive that people can’t change. Yet when young, they dreamt about
omniscience, perfect relationships, and perfect worlds. We are still that naive.
We’ll build a world based on logical reasoning.
Don’t reply to this letter because we will not read it. Try a google search on the
following words.
arrogant teenage intelligence students immature
philosophy strategy ideology logic holistic
pure general design order insecure
terrestrial personality intolerant defiance distrust
social felicitation spiritual art traits
indoctrination Borg monomania concrete clandestine
I advise choosing three words for each search request. That makes for
an intimidating number of different searches, so only the brave will learn the truth.