Newman you suck at the internet. Or maybe I do. Either way i can’t see shit.
It’s the anti-supra.
What he didn’t tell you is that it’s only making 12 hp. 
hmm, well, it was just a google image of the same civic… ten times.
lol. i’ll look for a different one.
[quote=“newman,post:19,topic:25958"”]
also 1000 ft-lb
[/quote]
…
i was thinking the same thing as butch. i expected to see a VERY large foot
[quote=“JUICEDSS,post:10,topic:25958"”]
I believe it would be foot lb., not lb. foot. This is what a 1000 lb ft Looks Like. lol
[/quote]
hahaha
as far as torque is concerned. 1000lbs at 1 foot = 1lb at 1000 feet.
1000 lb-ft is correct.
[quote=“LAFENGAS,post:26,topic:25958"”]
hahaha
as far as torque is concerned. 1000lbs at 1 foot = 1lb at 1000 feet.
1000 lb-ft is correct.
[/quote]
The cross product is not commutative.
So force crossed into distance is not equal to distance crossed into force.
actually:
F X D = -1 (D X F)
what i’m saying is whether it’s r x F or F x r, both = t.
[quote=“newman,post:27,topic:25958"”]
The cross product is not commutative.
So force crossed into distance is not equal to distance crossed into force.
actually:
F X D = -1 (D X F)
[/quote]
damn. i am not trying to hate cuz thats obviously a proven setup since you are making lotsa tq…but is that passenger side exhaust flow make a 90 degree approach into the turbo housing?
[quote=“audios,post:29,topic:25958"”]
damn. i am not trying to hate cuz thats obviously a proven setup since you are making lotsa tq…but is that passenger side exhaust flow make a 90 degree approach into the turbo housing?
[/quote]
stop going back on topic.
Did, u do some header flipping or are those made for the setup? I guess Im asking, did u build this from scrath or buy a kit? I wanna build my own sooner or later…but, gonna give my car one season with the present setup (S/C’ed) before switching to a turbo.
Looks good :tup:
[quote=“LAFENGAS,post:28,topic:25958"”]
what i’m saying is whether it’s r x F or F x r, both = t.
[/quote]
That would be true for a dot product, but since it is cross product (ie directional) r x F would be in the opposite direction as F x r
ie 
where b x a would give you a negative angle to the equation
[quote=“66impalass,post:32,topic:25958"”]
snip
[/quote]
I do my right hand thumb rule last. 
That is quite the impressive.
[quote=“66impalass,post:32,topic:25958"”]
That would be true for a dot product, but since it is cross product (ie directional) r x F would be in the opposite direction as F x r
ie
where b x a would give you a negative angle to the equation
[/quote]
yep. this is what i was saying.
Shit it’s been a while, but I thought Force x distance is vector x scalar. I.E. distance is just a magnitude so all that cross product crap is irrelavent.
I go online to kill some time and take a break from technical thinking and I get caught up in a fucking vector multiplication discussion. :lol:
[quote=“BikerFry,post:37,topic:25958"”]
distance is just a magnitude
[/quote]
:ham: :bloated: 
Then it would not use a cross product, it would be T=dF
a^2+b^2=c^2… do you guys understand now?