Would you race this guy for money?

Tom-

I don’t know ya, but you’ve made two assumptions about me tonight based on not very much at all :lol

To start off I go to LVD every single wednesday, just about zero exceptions. I’m no genius, but i have been in some pretty fast cars and have a good sense of “speed”, I guess you could say.

#1 I did not say 8 seconds, I said sub 10. 9.999 is sub 10 if you want to get techincal.

#2 Here is an example of a 9.5 @ 145.0 car with a 98% stock body, let alone a STOCK FRAME TURBO.

I’ve spent too much time on evolutionm.net for my own good and I could list out a “build” that would have a stock intake and exhaust manifold (both ported), stock heatshield over a stock-frame turbo, what appears to be a stock airbox, stock catback (with cutout downpipe, of course) a black anodized intercooler etc etc etc (aka 100% stock as a ROCK to anyone who is not a relatively heavily educated EVO enthusiast) that would run mid 10’s at mid 130’s. I’m going to ASSUME (:D) that you don’t give a shit so I’m not going to bother wasting either of our times going into further detail :rofl

This is just an example of the kind of “sleeper” that I’m talking about.

Bottom line if the owner cares about having the car be a sleeper it can be very difficult based on looks alone (exterior or in the case above, even the engine bay) to determine speed. Also with stock catback, a cutout, and another resonator or muffler after the cutout a ridiculously fast car can be made damn near stock volume as well

-Ryan :slight_smile:

Id run it in the kia,shits dumb fast yo!

I get some time off in May.

Haven’t been to your neighborhood since I was 10.

I can’t wait, man, my fucking car is stuck on the street. A monkey is sitting on it right now.

Tom

Look forward to it man! And wtf, monkey in the street?? :lol

not one bit, car is a major sleeper, read something about this car on ls1tech, serious power

Nothing like cutting 1.4X’s on 17" drag radials!!

Ryan,

Listen, go to the track, don’t tell me about your friends car that ran 9.99 once.

I said there is a big difference between an 8.99 car and a 10.99 car.

Then I get this: #2 Here is an example of a 9.5 @ 145.0 car with a 98% stock body, let alone a STOCK FRAME TURBO.

What the fuck is a stock frame turbo? :lol

Tom

i cut sub 1.4’s u bitch ass

About that :lmao

Its ricer talk to make it sound like they are achieving more than they are. Essentially trying to call a different turbo a “stock” turbo

Me too.

1.29, wheels up.

1.29 goin 11.7??

I’m in red

I’m not trying to argue here. My first post was just saying that any car can be a sleeper visually and be very fast. Thats all I was trying to say. You took what I said and kind of twisted it and took it out of context, I doubt intentionally but that’s what happened :lol

You are a fag. Gay as a fucking fag can be.

:wow quite the post :lol

tom, you are dense.

a stock frame turbo is a stock appearing turbocharger. whats there not to get?

-Jeffey gordonian

I’ll run him in my friends Viper, no problem. Even give him a few lengths!

whoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ABS

calm down !!!

SHIT

i will gladly “run” the owner of that car any day of the week for LOTS of money. 100 yards ON FOOT. no cars, engines, or tires involved… betcha i win.:thumbup

Definitely ricer talk.

+rep if The ARS actually wrote what you quoted.