I’ve been trying to search up some 70s/80s/early 90s automobiles that to an enthusiast is awesome/collector item, but to the average person, they wouldnt know a difference or care. focusinprogress’ post about the shelby made me start this one.
Cars during this era with awesome engine swaps count also!
I acctully dont have the SHO anymore, and theres a CSVT owner on here “SVTDriver” has a black 98 CSVT, and yeah theres a pretty good following of them, there was just a big meet at springzing a month or so ago, as far as people modding them, 3.0 Turbo CSVT = Sex.
Isnt that the point of enthusiest cars that no one really cares about ? there almost always ugly, usally crappy, but for some reason we love em anyway.
Performing well is usually helpful too, or having a decent bit of styling. But hey, when you start with underperforming, understyled american crap, what can you expect. You cant polish shit.
I agree, name more than a few americian cars that are acctully any good, and whats wrong with the CVST, it fits in the catagory of a supposed enthusist cars that no one would really notice or even care if they did, right ?
I’ve been trying to search up some 70s/80s/early 90s automobiles that to an enthusiast is awesome/collector item, but to the average person, they wouldnt know a difference or care. focusinprogress’ post about the shelby made me start this one.
Cars during this era with awesome engine swaps count also!
[/quote]
I don’t think the general public would look twice at an E30 M3. A non-enthusiast would just see a boxy old piece of crap. Same with Buick GN’s.
I’d add thunderbird turbocoupes and supercoupes, but they just sucked.