by default…poster identification is wayyyy too difficult w/o AVs
Allow both.
[quote=“MPD47,post:2,topic:31223"”]
Allow both.
[/quote]
Sigs should be allowed but “off” unless you click the append signature button…just like OT
That’s like the guy on Rennlist that wanted to ban women in skimpy clothing for avatars rather than just turn them off. I’d much rather have all options on, and just have the ability to limit content on my end. But I prefer self regulation.
but sigs off by default allows for the opportunity for uber long quote filled hilarious sigs :tup:
either way, AVs need to be back…STAT
:word:
i miss avatars
sigs are for faggots
i like both… just have it so u only see the sig once one 1 page and make the limit smaller
Seriously, please bring AV’s back.
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:7,topic:31223"”]
Avatars :tup:
Sigs :tdown:
[/quote]
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:7,topic:31223"”]
Avatars :tup:
Sigs :tdown:
[/quote]
:tspry:
i like both.
i need the ability to annoy in 500X100 when needed.
[quote=“Bigairskier1580,post:15,topic:31223"”]
Could care less.
I have sigs and avs off in personal preferences anyways.
[/quote]
I have sigs off, however AVs make it super easy to reference which posts should be skipped over.
[quote=“newman,post:14,topic:31223"”]
i like both.
i need the ability to annoy in 500X100 when needed.
[/quote]
Yeah, you should have special permission to piss people off. :lolsign:
X…
just curious, why did AV’s get taken away?
I actually like no avs.
Sigs are cool, lets you express yourself more, and if you fuck up we can take away.
We can take away Avs too you know 
It’s already setup.
The thing is folks, every avatar has to be stored in our database (even the ones from url links). mass storage of 2000 + avatars = Bandwith :bloated:
You’re going to need a really good argument other than I want them" :shrug: