Bush admits he is a war criminal

[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif][size=6]Bush Seeks Retroactive Laws To Protect Himself From War Crimes Prosecution[/size][/font]

[font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]by [email=“paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com”]Paul Craig Roberts
[size=1]by Paul Craig Roberts
[/size][/font]

window.onerror=function(){clickURL=document.location.href;return true;} if(!self.clickURL) clickURL=parent.location.href; When I was a kid John Wayne war movies gave us the message that America was the good guy, the white hat that fought the villain. Alas, today the US and its last remaining non-coerced ally, Israel, are almost universally regarded as the bad guys over whom John Wayne would triumph. Today the US and Israel are seen throughout the world as war criminal states.

On August 23 the BBC reported that Amnesty International has brought war crimes charges against Israel for deliberately targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure as an “integral part” of Israel’s strategy in its recent invasion of Lebanon.

Israel claims that its aggression was “self-defense” to dislodge Hezbollah from southern Lebanon. Yet, Israel bombed residential communities all over Lebanon, even Christian communities in the north in which no Hezbollah could possibly have been present.

United Nations spokesman Jean Fabre reported that Israel’s attack on civilian infrastructure annihilated Lebanon’s development: “Fifteen years of work have been wiped out in a month.”

Israel maintains that this massive destruction was unintended “collateral damage.”

President Bush maintains that Israel has “a right to protect itself” by destroying Lebanon.

Bush blocked the attempt to stop Israel’s aggression and is, thereby, equally responsible for the war crimes. Indeed, a number of reports claim that Bush instigated the Israeli aggression against Lebanon.

Bush has other war crime problems. Benjamin Ferenccz, a chief prosecutor of Nazi war crimes at Nuremberg, recently said that President Bush should be tried as a war criminal side by side with Saddam Hussein for starting aggressive wars, Hussein for his 1990 invasion of Kuwait and Bush for his 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Under the Nuremberg standard, Bush is definitely a war criminal. The US Supreme Court also exposed Bush to war crime charges under both the US War Crimes Act of 1996 and the Geneva Conventions when the Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld against the Bush administration’s military tribunals and inhumane treatment of detainees.

President Bush and his Attorney General agree that under existing laws and treaties Bush is a war criminal together with many members of his government. To make his war crimes legal after the fact, Bush has instructed the Justice (sic) Department to draft changes to the War Crimes Act and to US treaty obligations under the Geneva Conventions.

One of Bush’s changes would deny protection of the Geneva Conventions to anyone in any American court.

Bush’s other change would protect from prosecution any US government official or military personnel guilty of violating Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. Article 3 prohibits “at any time and in any place whatsoever outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment.” As civil libertarian Nat Hentoff observes, this change would also undo Senator John McCain’s amendment against torture.

Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice says that Bush’s changes “immunize past crimes.”

Under the US Constitution and US legal tradition, retroactive law is impermissible. What do Americans think of their President’s attempts to immunize himself, his government, CIA operatives, military personnel and civilian contractors from war crimes?

Apparently, the self-righteous morally superior American “Christian” public could care less. The Republican controlled House and Senate, which long ago traded integrity for power, are working to pass Bush’s changes prior to the mid-term elections in the event the Republicans fail to steal three elections in a row and Democrats win control of the House or Senate.

Meanwhile, the illegal war in Iraq, based entirely on Bush administration lies, grinds on, murdering and maiming ever more people. According to the latest administration estimate, the pointless killing will go on for another 10-15 years.

Trouble is, there are no US troops to carry on the war. The lack of cannon fodder forces the Bush administration to resort to ever more desperate measures. The latest is the involuntary recall of thousands of Marines from the inactive reserves to active duty. Many attentive people regard this desperate measure as a sign that the military draft will be reinstated.

According to President Bush, the US will lose the “war on terror” unless the US succeeds in defeating “the Iraqi terrorists” by establishing “democracy in Iraq.” Of course, insurgents resisting occupation are not terrorists, and there were no insurgents or terrorists in Iraq until Bush invaded.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/tyranny.jpgBush’s unjustified invasion of Iraq and his support for Israeli aggression have done more to create terrorism in the Muslim world than Osama bin Laden could hope for. The longer Bush occupies Iraq and the more he tries to extend US/Israeli hegemony in the Middle East, the more terrorism the world will suffer.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts2.jpgBush and the neocon ideology that holds him captive are the greatest 21st century threats to peace and stability. The neoconized Bush regime invented the war on terror, lost it, and now is bringing terror home to the American people.

[right]August 29, 2006
[/right]
[left][font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Dr. Roberts [[email=“paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com”]send him mail] [size=3][font=Times New Roman, Times, serif]is Chairman of the Institute for Political Economy and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute. He is a former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, former contributing editor for National Review, and was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He is the co-author of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. [/font][/size][/font]

Copyright © 2006 LewRockwell.com
[/left]
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts169.html

while i think that’s interesting and i am firmly anti bush… that is definitely not be considered a news article. while it contains facts, it’s clearly bias left.

:lol:

riiiight, I dont suppose You fact checked, or expect it to be an objective statement at all eh?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/

http://www.lewrockwell.com/buttons/lewrock0305a.gif

:eekdance:

“my girlfriend votes against bush every morning in the shower.”

This is what scares me about so many of the anti-bush voters… they just blindly believe anything they read on the internet as long as it’s anti-bush. And these people get to vote. :ohnoes: If you don’t agree with his policies, fine, but don’t just blindly believe every piece of trash that gets put on the internet.

:needpic:

not a fan of this, i felt that unlike us, israel was warranted in what they did.

i don’t have a girlfriend. but you have inspired me to start a new thread.

but how’s the * ?

:word:

:word: But, it totally goes both ways.

oh that’s fucking priceless right there

Hahaha, totally saved me the effort of quoting it. :lol:

HAHAHAHHAHAHAH joe thats easily the funniest thing ive read all day

And why is this, because I agree with him?

that goes both ways

this is one reason I did not vote last time there was a predidential election. I already knew I didn’t like Bush, however, I didn’t know any of the other guy’s policies. I’m not going to vote for the “lesser evil” when I don’t really know how evil the other guy actually is.

One thing for sure though…had a democrat been put in the office there would be no pussyfooting on the US’s part in the middle east. they would have either been yanked and call it a day, or yanked so they can glass the place over. there’s no middle of the spectrum on their intents. (however, implementation might be half-assed, a la Bill Clinton with Operation Desert Fox)

I didn’t want a job to be half-done. So while I don’t like Bush, I’m not totally disappointed he got voted in.

fuckin lefties, go have a kegger with old cindy, hilary and Lord fuck face Churchill, and stop posting dumb shit. :slight_smile:

lol fixed