This would be a fun toy … :noes:
OMFG look at that dyno graph!!!
400hp at 3700rpm - 1003hp at 7200rpm
wow… that’s like 730 ft lbs. or so at peak torque.
wow that looks so good
I would. twice.
I don’t know what the hell they did to the body, but the rear end looks like complete shit.
I was never a fan of that front bumper either 79/80 ftw.
Don’t think I have ever seen piping that big for a supercharger either.
Yet again, American Muscle FTMFW
I’ll take all three.
in the butt.
my dad had an early 70s camaro back in the day, we use to do doughnuts in the canadian tire parking lot.
yea my dad used to have a plum purple dodge dart, sounded so mean lol + the burnouts ^
Funny to see a track car Camaro Z28 in Europe! … If I’m not mistaken that car is in Denmark.
If I had extra money for Camaro, that’ll be it.
needs a bigger wing. i cant imagine that being even close to enough downforce for 1000hp.
ummm about that dyno… isn’t tq and hp supposed to always cross at 5250? fake?
when did they start putting the same motor in every car?
uh, what? what are you talking about? the engine type has nothin to do with it
in the above graph the hp and tq don’t cross at 5252 because the graph is using different units (torque in the graph is being measured in Nm as opposed to lb-ft)
using any engine, a graph of hp and lb-ft (both measurements being at the same scale) will always see em cross at 5252rpm
^Yeah, its just a mathematical correlation that torque measured in lb-ft is equal to hp at 5252rpm. Newton meters are 1/1.356 of a lb-ft, so the whole torque curve sits higher on the graph. It doesn’t change anything.
This is all regardless of the engine, its purely math.
Edit: I just read spd-dmn’s response, he put it in better words. lol
wow that would be a machine and rocket ship all in one. I think the whole car looks great, good job for them
thanks for the clear up guys, should have caught that my self
Fucking jizz in my pants.
Hawt… sooooo damn hawt.
+1!