Fixing New York State, Constitutional Convention.

I’m not going to give a source and I’d appreciate if no one did for a little while. It has some great advice for this state and is the best answer I’ve seen in a long time.

NEW YORK STATE government is not working. This has been true for some time. But the paralysis and confusion that has overtaken the capital demonstrates the need to confront this dysfunction directly and take decisive steps to solve it once and for all. That’s why I’m calling on Albany to convene a state constitutional convention.
This is not a partisan criticism. There is enough blame for all to share. Recently, though, the situation in our state has gone from bad to worse.
There are more New Yorkers unemployed than at any time in 33 years, and the poverty rate is rising. Our combined state and local tax burden is the highest in the nation after New Jersey. Our business tax climate is rated the second worst in the country. And in the face of the worst recession in a quarter-century, the State Legislature decided to increase spending by 9 percent while increasing taxes and fees by $8 billion. No wonder a recent poll showed that more than 20 percent of New Yorkers are thinking of leaving the state in search of lower taxes and fewer government mandates.
Over the course of New York’s history, our state has held seven constitutional conventions, one as recently as 1967. Calling another convention would be an extraordinary step, but it is a necessary and effective way to overcome the challenges we face. It would be an opportunity for Republicans, Democrats and independents to come together, take a long hard look at our problems and then propose real, lasting solutions.
If the State Legislature were to approve the measure in the next few weeks, New Yorkers could vote on whether to proceed with a constitutional convention this November. A “yes” vote would move the process forward, allowing voters to choose a slate of delegates in November 2010. After the convention took place, the recommendations would be put forward to the people for an up-and-down vote.
The specific measures should be left to the convention itself and then judged by the voters. But to start the debate I offer seven recommendations for reform.

THE BUDGET PROCESS The governor should be empowered to set revenue estimates on his own, as the mayor of New York City does, adjusting future spending against responsible benchmarks rather than unrealistic estimates. The budget should conform to generally accepted accounting principles, and there should also be a formal four-year financial plan allowing for transparency and long-term planning. Finally, if a new budget is not adopted by April 1, the previous year’s budget should be automatically continued.

TERM LIMITS All statewide elected officials and members of the Legislature should be term limited to bring new blood into Albany while stopping the careerism that too often blocks real progress. A citizens’ legislature would be more effective in addressing New Yorkers’ problems with a fresh perspective.

REDISTRICTING New York’s Legislature has been called the most dysfunctional in the nation, yet Albany legislators enjoy a 98 percent re-election rate. They avoid accountability through partisan gerrymandering, which has reduced the number of competitive elections, depriving millions of voters of real choices.
An independent commission, rather than the legislators themselves, should draw up district lines to ensure the system is not rigged to reward incumbent legislators or one party over another.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE Special interests have a disproportionate influence over state politics in large part because of a weak campaign finance system with high contribution limits and lax disclosure requirements. Individuals can give up to $55,900 to gubernatorial candidates and $15,500 for State Senate candidates. Unions and other special interests exploit loopholes that allow millions of dollars worth of phone banks, volunteers and other in-kind contributions. There are no regular audits and minimal fines, and an unlimited amount of money can be transferred to candidates from party committees.

SUPERMAJORITY FOR TAX INCREASES Too often increasing taxes is the first impulse for Albany legislators. Requiring a supermajority for tax increases would provide a powerful check on those who still think we can tax and spend our way out of economic problems. A supermajority would protect already over-burdened citizens and attract businesses, improving our long-term competitiveness.

JUDICIAL PAY The integrity of an independent judiciary depends on being able to attract qualified people who are not beholden to party bosses and power brokers. Instituting an automatic cost-of-living adjustment on an improved base salary would take the politics out of judicial pay raises.

SUCCESSION FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Over the last 40 years, New York has been without a lieutenant governor three times. The lack of any established process of succession for the state’s second in command creates the potential for chaos. In the interest of simplicity, stability and transparency, clear lines of succession must be established.
Many of these suggestions have enjoyed bipartisan support in the past. What’s been missing is action. Legislators have not been leading. But we citizens can take charge and carry out these fundamental reforms through a constitutional convention. Together we can cure the structural dysfunction of our politics and hand New York to the next generation better and stronger than it was handed to us.

:tup:

hmm. This sounds like it was written by a moderate/fiscal Conservative.

I like some of his ideas and dislike some. A constitutional convention would be appropriate right around now, but the problem is it would be run by the same assholes that are screwing state gov’t up now if I’m not mistaken.
A supermajority for tax increases could be a nightmare. I could see that turning into a stalemate like we have now, only on a yearly basis for every budget. Then the gov’t would just end up borrowing more and making things worse.
Redistricting wouldn’t solve anything because they’d just gerrymander the districts in a different way with the same result. We’ll never get outsiders to align the districts.
Campaign finance- agreed, but they’d just find another loophole. They always do.
As for the budget, I’d rather see the current process continued, but opened up to the whole houses of the legislature, not just 3 men in a room. USGAAP and 4 year transparency plan, :tup:
Succession for lieutenant governor, :tup: I’m just not sure how it would work. Does the leader of the Senate get 2 votes? Does he have to leave his current job for one where largely you wake up, call the governor, wait for him to answer, then your job is done for the day?
Is there really a problem with what we pay our judges now? I’m not familiar with the issue.
Overall, I like the idea, if not some of his emphasis points.

Joe, did you even read it? Most of your points were covered.

If the State Legislature were to approve the measure in the next few weeks, New Yorkers could vote on whether to proceed with a constitutional convention this November. A “yes” vote would move the process forward, allowing voters to choose a slate of delegates in November 2010. After the convention took place, the recommendations would be put forward to the people for an up-and-down vote.
The specific measures should be left to the convention itself and then judged by the voters.

So yes, the voters would have a say on who came up with the new Constitution, and they would have to approve of it once it was crafted.

An independent commission, rather than the legislators themselves, should draw up district lines to ensure the system is not rigged to reward incumbent legislators or one party over another.

Will that independent commission ever be 100% without partisan politics… probably not. But it’s would be a 1000x improvement on what we have now.

I’m not sure we would need the supermajority on taxes if the other changes were actually implemented.

I read it, but I was on a conference call. So I guess I didn’t read all of it. Sounds better now. Who would these delegates be though?

Edit: NM

Edit:

NM as well. :wink:

^After once I realized, I deleted. lol

Not too hard to figure it was him though. What other fiscal conservative would put that much thought into NY? lol

If a constitutional convention comes out of this mess I’d like to see a hybrid democracy like seen in many mid-west states and Florida. If NY citizens had the ballot initiative it would be a good way to keep government in check.

The reason states like New York don’t have the ballot initiative is because it has to be passed by the NYS legislators who in turn would lose their monopoly of power.

the ballot initiative sucks. It causes all sorts of stupid shit to be passed in CA by people too stupid to realize the consequences.

^ It sounds good on paper but yeah, CA is a great example of how it can go very wrong.

Sort of on topic, I would love to see the individual credit scores of the NYS legislature members. I am guessing they average around 450.lol

California is the worst case example. There are plenty of states in the west that carry out the ballot initiative without the stupid stuff.There are a few versions of the B-I that can keep the CA bullshit out of the mix to a certain extent.

Twenty-four states have the B-I. How many do you here about in the news making stupid laws? It is a tried and true system that has been around since my home state(South Dakota) became a state in 1898. Many European countries also have some sort of direct democracy, Sweden probably being the best example.

The truth is, that states with B-I have lower taxes, smaller governments, less social welfare spending and politicians who actually listen to voters.

Every system has flaws, but at least with a hybrid democracy the people have an actual way of controlling what is done in their government.

They also have shit schools, mediocre health care, etc. because no one wants to pay for it til they need it.

Do you have examples? because I could give you plenty of states that have quite the opposite.

I would put the New York public school/SUNY system up against South Dakota or any of those states. I don’t have time to do any research right now but ballot initiatives are where you get stupid shit like same sex marriage bans, and generally favor conservatives in government because they motivate a lot of old people to come out and vote for something that isn’t good for anyone else. Old people are the ones who vote. They’re also easily convinced by barrages of special interest advertising.

I’m so glad I live in Texas. Maybe if you fix NY I’ll move back. :stuck_out_tongue:

NYS

  1. Get rid of 1/2 of the offices and their employees.
  2. Get some new ambitious blood in office.
  3. Simplify things and actually get things finished in a timely manor.
  4. Run NYS like a business.

^^They also have more real life experience. The sooner you admit this the better off you are.:wink:

they can stick their life experience because they’re dead by the time the shit that they vote for screws us. Also age does not imply life experience. I know people in their 80’s that have never been out of Western New York, even on a vacation. They don’t have more life experience than I do, they just have the same experience for more time.

You’re so worldly.:roll2: Your springbreak in Cancun could qualify you for Pres.