thought there may be intrest thats all, you people could just say no… lol but w/e i just thought the miles were amazing for an 03 mustang.
the guy next store has one, in black with 3000 on it, there rare?
I wouldn’t buy a car like this as an investment. Fun car to drive, sure. Investment, not so much.
You want an investment Mach 1 take your $25K and buy a '69 or '70 big-block. Market is moving upwards on these very steadily.
BUT, clean car, GLWS and such :tup:
Its pretty cool to have a car like this with so few miles, or any type of car a couple years old for that matter…
Nice clean ride man!
GLWS
nice car, i like the Mach 1s like that, just not that color. I really dont think cars of today are going to hold value like the ones we now consider to be classics. for example, when im 50 years old, i dont see a 2000 Mustang GT being worth a lot of money. but then again, my uncle probably thought the same thing in the early 70s when he sold his 1969 Boss 429 Mustang.
[quote=“brent_strong,post:19,topic:26596"”]
No, it wouldn’t be, even then. It’d have to be worth a retardedly huge sum of money in 50-60 years to outstrip the worth of normal investments.
[/quote]
werd…take 20k and put it into a CD or Stock and you will get more more than you could ever get for a mustang.
i think OP directed his comment about “no depreciation value” to people who do not know anything about car…
i think it’s OK, i mean…it’s a FS thread…
funny thing. it’s posted in a forum where supposedly 99.99% of all members are car literate…
anyway, GLWTS! nice car 
[quote=“Karu,post:28,topic:26596"”]
i think OP directed his comment about “no depreciation value”
[/quote]
The only problem is…all cars go through depreciation. Even exotics. No one will pay sticker price for an automobile 20-50 years down the road for a mass produced car. If there was only 100 units made, maybe…but not a mustang. No offense to mustang guys.
very few cars are “good investments”
These were the type of car that many collectors purchased and put away to preserve rendering them a too common in that condition to allow it to hold its value into the future.
Normally I don’t like it when people rip apart FS threads, but this one is making some unrealistic claims.
actually, i think we are really helping the OP by keep bumping this thread up.
maybe that’s his real intention. lol.
[quote=“JustinH,post:15,topic:26596"”]
The only one that holds value is the cobra R in my opinion.
[/quote]
no opinion needed, thats a fact, especially when only 385 are produced in the world…
[quote=“Marcus,post:29,topic:26596"”]
No one will pay sticker price for an automobile 20-50 years down the road for a mass produced car. If there was only 100 units made, maybe…but not a mustang.
[/quote]
You’re right, they could pay more.
Check the values on restored Shelby and Boss Mustangs. Hell, even restored A- and C-code '65-'68 fastbacks are in the $25-30K range. It goes up daily. Camaros, 'Cudas, etc. are even pricier. They were all definitely mass-produced cars.
No offense to mustang guys.
None taken. You are right - just because it’s a Mach and it was “limited” production doesn’t mean it will be worth anything in 30 years. Rarity alone does not a valuable car make.
GLWS
[quote=“TrueBlue,post:35,topic:26596"”]
You’re right, they could pay more.
Check the values on restored Shelby and Boss Mustangs. Hell, even restored A- and C-code '65-'68 fastbacks are in the $25-30K range. It goes up daily. Camaros, 'Cudas, etc. are even pricier. They were all definitely mass-produced cars.
None taken. You are right - just because it’s a Mach and it was “limited” production doesn’t mean it will be worth anything in 30 years. Rarity alone does not a valuable car make.
GLWS
[/quote]
k-code for the win