Negative, sir. You are not going across the bridge, you are entering the bridge near the end and walking the rest of the distance. Walking 1/4 of the bridge length is not 4/4 of the bridge. Despite what your lawyer says, he doesn’t have a degree in English, therefore can not LEGALLY give his “expert” opinion on matters of the English language.
Lettuce be cereal, he asked if you had proof of the weight of the car and you said he’s wrong lol. That just makes no sense.
I’m not even trying to be an asshole, but your ad is lying. You said it makes 371whp as it sits, not if you add a few more pounds of boost and what not.
No one on here is going to buy the car, so everyone should just take this as lesson learned. Anyone remember business law from high school, and the phrase “caveat emptor?”
“Under the doctrine of caveat emptor, the buyer could not recover from the seller for defects on the property that rendered the property unfit for ordinary purposes. The only exception was if the seller actively concealed latent defects or otherwise made material misrepresentations amounting to fraud.”
I’m only trying to help you prevent getting sued should someone buy the car, and prove the fallacies of your ad. By posting it on there, that is step one to a legally binding contract.