500whp 346ft-lb @ 20psi
632whp 432ft-lb @ 27psi
Not sure if it’s a repost…but damn!
Wow…where did they mount the turbo…I can’t seem to find it…
^^^ LOL.
That car is incredible…looks great too.
wow huge numbers
lol i love the number down by the daily driver/sorta gas friendly rpm lol 4000rpm under 100hp lol hahahaha godbless super low compression highouput turbos!
lol hahaha man thecost of fuel to run that motor…
Yeah honestly 93 octane is mad expensive… :?
Yeah just imagine 1600cc injectors at WOT! 
Eeeekad!
Yeah honestly 93 octane is mad expensive… :?[/quote]
no it’s not, but having to keep the revs past 4000rpm isn’t all that great for millage…thats all, shit i know filling up the tank every 150km must be damn cheap!
you got mad problems lately jantos, keep it p buddy. keep it up.
look at the graph man, that isn’t a daily dirver, thats a track or drag only car. there is NO useable powerband below 4000rpm…now i don’t know about most of you, but i don’t really sit in the 5500rpm powerband all day.
i’m not saying the huge hp numbers aren’t great, infact the oppisite…just commenting on the trade offs of superlow compression turbo motors…efectiviley makes the car as bad on gas as a 572 chevy…actually worse…and wait, a 572 makes hp before 5500rpm…
just commenting on the trade offs…nice curve tho…wish i had money to build something like that and afford to drive it.
^^^ LOL, I got problems eh… :roll:
I have a video of that car on the street at 23 PSI running a souped 300ZX…clearly
it’s somewhat streetable…but I see your point on the powerband. He probably
just wanted the max HP numbers.
Quality work and good tuning translates to high horsepower, under strong loads, without undue stress…
It’s called doing it right…
=D> I couldn’t have said it better my self. I totally agree with you on that.