Fry
December 5, 2008, 12:39pm
121
Bacon:
This thread is full of suck, and rather depressing to boot.
The guy had way to many reasons to even be near a car. Period.
I mean honestly:
-No License
-No Insurance
-Prior for drunk driving
-Drunk
:word:
Things we know:
Drive was drunk
Driver had no license
Driver has history of drunk driving
Driver hit pedestrians
Pedestrian mother died
Things we don’t know:
How fast driver was going
Color of light
If “walk” or “don’t walk” was on
If there was even a “walk” or “don’t walk” sign
:gotme:
Don’t pedestrians ALWAYS have the right of way, legally?
Avatar
December 5, 2008, 12:42pm
122
Growing up with no parents except possibly the surrogate of aunt or grandmother is no better. There is no father in this family.
A motorist must yield to a pedestrian. Especially, in a crosswalk no matter what color the light is.
JayS
December 5, 2008, 12:46pm
123
There are definitely exceptions, like stepping out in front of a vehicle where the vehicle has no chance of stopping. Which may or may not be the case here.
JayS:
^ Just for suggesting that the city should have even .000000001 % liability I’m buying my wife a diamond necklace just to piss you off.
Seriously, you bleeding heart liberals really bug me. How the hell is the city at all responsible for this?
Hey now don’t put this on all liberals. I think there is only one criminal here… the driver
Updated: Thursday, 08 Jan 2009, 1:22 PM EST
Published : Thursday, 08 Jan 2009, 1:22 PM EST
???
Wrong link hold on… edit fixed link in original post
The original news articles in this thread are gone, so here’s something at least:
lol