MEH
Email me with specs and pics. khunt0012@hotmail.com
Looks good.
lol just for fun… it’s not fast, it’s not that clean…
but it’s unique
“Is that an AE86?” 
lol
So far my vote is for DETS14’s black and white pic (the last one he posted).
Could’ve done a little better on the angle on that but it looks great.
Black border ftw.
lol, ThankYOU Scott. Muahahahaha. Thanks Gonad.
lol, ThankYOU Scott. Muahahahaha. Thanks Gonad.[/quote]
Personally, as a fellow zenki owner, I’d have to say if my car looked half that good… wow.
Nice job with the car man.
Wow, I must say, lots of nice cars here guys.
If you’d like the best/fastest response, email me with your pics and a mod list and I’ll get back to you.
Thanks!
lol, ThankYOU Scott. Muahahahaha. Thanks Gonad.[/quote]
Personally, as a fellow zenki owner, I’d have to say if my car looked half that good… wow.
Nice job with the car man.[/quote]
Thanks a lot man, I appreciate the compliment.
i want to pic whore too
I love you Mike
i have a JDM RHD s14 with a custom vertex body kit on it and rb25det
want to take pics?
here is a sample pic
sasha u dont have enough
any daily driver drift car is gona be beat the fuck up, if its not then they are either wealthy or poseurrr
pics are played out, somone buy a nice video camera and make some kick ass movies.
Then you’re posting in the wrong thread. :roll:
Come talk to me when you take pics like mine…Some people jsut don’t get it. If you’re not interested just don’t post in here.
hahaha, yah jesse, your car isn’t REAL jdm, or mugened out, so sell it.
Apple, my car is more jdm than yours. :owned: :slap:
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i had never seen your car look like that before, SEXY SHITE.
Y’know, there’s a saying about britches, and about being too large for one’s own.
When I see amateurs trying to make a name for themselves, I usually can handle a certain dose of self-engratiating jibber jabber.
Now you’re just being arrogant.
Having an entry-level SLR like the Canon Rebel does not make you a photographer of note. None of the images you’ve supplied show me any understanding of an SLR camera, nor do you in any way seem to understand why SLRs are necessary for professional photography. In short, you could easily have taken the same images with a point-and-shoot camera.
Consitently producing very static images, whether you take 700 or 7,000 of them does not make you a photographer of note. Buy some lenses man, or at least use them effectively.
I’m also curious as to which magazines your friend has done editing for. Because I can guarantee you my mag and any others I’ve had the chance to work for, all do photo edits in house through the art director. See, we hate photogs that do their own edits, because they always try and make a good image out of something that’s not there. If you’re shooting for print, most edits will actually become painfully obvious when the image is actually printed.
If you’re not shooting for print, you’re wasting space on your camera and your web site. Web images, even high res web images, should be kept to 72 dpi or your site will load like serious ass. Even wallpapers and large images are kept quite small. A good web designer can create very clear and impressive images and keep file sizes down.
Good luck with your site, but please refrain from trying to give us a lesson here. Taking high quality images of cars is an art form, and we pay people good money to do so.
Oh and Sasha, you don’t need a motor to do dramatic action shots. Just ask Danner, he’ll tell you how to do it.
Whoa, easyy there Ansel Adams. Nobody (before mr200, who brought you down to earth) was criticizing your photography - there’s no need to comport yourself in such an arrogant manner.
Here’s my pic… omg can I talk to you now?! :roll:
yup