Lance Armstrong tests positive for drugs!!

was there any ever doubt? :gotme: he’s like superman, im sure he’s taking a substance that is performance enhancing and cannot be tested for. :tup: to him anyway for beating the system.

can’t they just leave him alone?!?! He has one nut for crying out loud!

but people with 2 testes are fair game?

…and what if someone had three? Is he the target of the world?

LoL

Well let’s not going off and tooting a horn at Fox News for having it on their website:

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live/

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/more/wires/08/24/2080.ap.cyc.armstrong.doping.3rd.ld.writethru.0876/index.html

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/12459088.htm

i can remember a quote from daily show one night:

“now that lance armstrong has retired, america can stop caring about cycling”

lol.

The French can’t stand the fact that the only thing worthwhile that is named after them is dominated by an American.

what’s next?

french newspaper reports:

LANCE NEVER HAD CANCER!.. IT WAS AN ADVANCED FORM OF HERPES!?

maybe they should limit the participants to just be frenchy-foo-foo sissies, that way, that race won’t matter anymore, again.

ruh roh

oh jeez, just leave the one-nutted sheryl lovin’ biker man alone.
he’s just trying to be a happy retiree… riding in the fields with our president… :bloated:

bush needs to get back to work.
lance needs to quit maybe taking drugs in 1999.

oh wait, it’s 2005. who fucking cares.

why do i get the feeling that they INTENTIONALY waited till he retired, and INTENTIONALY used the sample from the FIRST year in order to cover his entire career with a blanket of half truths

if they had used this years sample people would have said “i wonder about the other years”

but by using the first years sample people are gonna assume “well if he doped the first year, he prolly doped every year”