I am looking for a drowning warning on my water bill.
fixed it for you lol
lol, yeah, that’s what I meant.
Most leagues don’t allow aluminum. :gotme: I don’t think colleges even use them any longer.
I don’t really follow college baseball, but last I remember all they used was aluminum.
I know there has been a lot of talk for years but maybe they still use them.
I think they stopped using cork filled aluminum bats. I’m not sure on a percentage, but wood/aluminum/cork filled all transfer energy differently.
I’d like to know why the bats construction was the reason why the ball was traveling at that speed, and it wasn’t the batter’s fault. I mean he must have really hit the ball hard to get those results so it is his fault.
Or is it the batter’s parents fault for conceiving him?
Or is it Wegman’s fault for selling awesome food, which this boy grew off of. If he wasn’t nourished so well, my child would still be alive.
I HATE SOCIETY so much sometimes.
Cool read on bats.
http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/bats-new/corkedbat.html
ever hit a small rock or golf ball with an aluminum bat?
I always had to sign waivers when I played organized baseball :shrug:
I bet it’s cause he wore dockers when he wasn’t playing baseball.
Get the job, get the dockers, look good in dockers, get the girls, get confident, play better at baseball, swing harder.
I blame dockers.
This is old news regarding the sue happiness. It’s always been like that. I did a report of rediculous lawsuits in American.
A lady sued Mcdonalds for slipping on coffee SHE spilled. Settlement was a few hundred thousand.
On February 6, a high school senior in Michigan filed suit against his principal, the superintendent, and the school board because he received an A instead of an A+.
One day earlier, a Michigan woman filed a $500,000 lawsuit after a beautician nicked her finger during a $5 fingernail repair.
On February 1, a Panama City Beach, Florida couple sued McDonald’s claiming an improperly prepared bagel damaged the husband’s teeth and ruined their marriage.
Nevertheless, a lot of people view our court system as a lottery – literally. In fact, one union member recruited by attorneys to file an asbestos lawsuit quipped, “It’s better than the lottery.” A co-worker who was 10 days from retirement said, 'The lawyers said I could get $10,000 or $12,000 if the shadow [on the x-ray] is big enough, and I know just the fishing boat I’d buy with that.” Asked if he’d ever worked with asbestos, he said, “No, but lawyers say it’s all over the place, so I was probably exposed to it."
This abuse has driven the American Bar Association and some trial lawyers to call for an end to court-clogging asbestos lawsuits by claimants who aren’t sick because real victims often die waiting for their day in court. In addition, frivolous asbestos lawsuits have driven so many companies out of business that there’s no one left to pay damages for truly deserving victims.
It’s time to end this abuse. So, how do we begin? One idea would be to adopt the “loser pays” system used in the United Kingdom and most of Europe to deter frivolous lawsuits. For example, in England last fall, a patient, who sued his doctor for $350 claiming the doctor had given him a cold during an examination, was ordered to pay almost $1,500 in costs after his case was thrown out of court.
Taken from http://www.awb.org/articles/legal/silly_lawsuits_are_no_laughing_matter.htm
PureXTC approves of this
PureXTC approves of this[/QUOTE]
Boom!
Protip: Don’t cite this lawsuit when discussing frivolous litigation. You’ll look dumb.
Dr. Ray Vegso to the rescue :lol:
its ridiculous how much farther you can hit the ball
Yes, and to a greater degree my training at JD school. Although, I don’t want to demean or take anything away from Prof. Vegso’s sage advice.
YES, WIN
http://www.kcra.com/cnn-news/21466354/detail.html
just adding to it.
I think that’s less frivolous than the bat thing.
Not by a lot, but less.