Montoya

[fairgentleman_Z]

Still dodging the original question :roll:

[eMKay]

@Zer0DazE

it wasnt you who said it. it came from your partner in crime.

if that were the case, i know a guy here who love craps, and usually cleans house. i bet he could win a few races.

Where in that quote did I say it was easy? I’m comparing NASCAR to F1. It takes skill to be successful in ANY racing, but F1 takes REAL skill. They type that you are born with, they type people rarely have. Those guys are gifted an an entirely different level than the rest of us.

[Zer0DazE]

@eMKay

No real driver skill involved.

.

[eMKay]

Where in that quote did I say it was easy? I’m comparing NASCAR to F1. It takes skill to be successful in ANY racing, but F1 takes REAL skill. They type that you are born with, they type people rarely have. Those guys are gifted an an entirely different level than the rest of us.

[Anonymity]

Ok, I thought by now you would have realized that your question is a factious statement.

Two cars running the same line on an oval would you conceder that “road racing “on an oval???

[fairgentleman_Z]

@fastandcheap

Two cars running the same line on an oval would you conceder that “road racing “on an oval???

No, that’s drafting, duh.

[Zer0DazE]

@eMKay

Where in that quote did I say it was easy? I’m comparing NASCAR to F1. It takes skill to be successful in ANY racing, but F1 takes REAL skill. They type that you are born with, they type people rarely have. Those guys are gifted an an entirely different level than the rest of us.

oh, im sorry, i took you saying that something takes no skill for being easy.
:bloated:

[Xander]

I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that F1 driving is “faster”, as in the reactions that the driver has to constantly make, even when there is no traffic involved, just to get around the track.

That would make it seem “more difficult” than NASCAR to drive, but there is a HUGE element of strategy involved.

X…

[RobHimself]

@sureshot007

My parents are big into Nascar, so I have watched alot of races, and know enough about the sport in general to consider myself more than a “casual observer”. The cars are far from “low tech”. And I can’t stand it when people claim pushrods as being “archaic”. My real beef with Nascar is that it used to be homologated. You used to be able to buy the same car off the lot. I could go to the deal and buy a super bee. That is what the sport did for the fans. Gave us awesome cars. What does it do now? Loosely bases the body on some crappy coupe, and then the insides are almost all the same. Whether they are turning in circles or not, it was what Nascar gave back to the fans that made them a success.

FUCKING AMEN TO THAT!!! Not really a nascar fan but i would be way more interested if these cars were even close to what you could buy.

[eMKay]

@Zer0DazE

oh, im sorry, i took you saying that something takes no skill for being easy.
:bloated:

That’s what happens when you assume.

[Zer0DazE]

dude, thats like saying
“oh, you’re nut ugly… just fat, really really not at all good looking, and you smell like a zoo.”

[Blue_Eyed_Devil]

Did my post on page one start a NASCAR vs F1 debate?

Relatively speaking NASCAR is low-tech compared to F1.
You can’t even begin to argue against that.

F1 skills are much more demanding that is why you don’t see a 40 year old F1 driver.
The reaction times cannot be achieved by older people.

The biggest thing they have in common is that they are both boring to watch.

I watch F1 to see amazing technology.
I watch(occasionally) NASCAR to see crashes.

I think it is safe to say that a F1 driver could make the switch a hell of a lot easier than a NASCAR driver could.

My 2 cents.