[quote=“nappy1380,post:24,topic:33196"”]
+1 for sure. I also agree that Vick shouldn’t be treated this way. Society as a whole is most likely sick of seeing sports figures that kids and adults alike look up to and watch them in the spotlight of the courts.
[/quote]
Treated in what way? Like someone that most likely committed something illegal and was federally indicted for it?
I know I’m personally not “sick” of seeing famous people/sports figures in the spotlight for this kind of stuff, if they do something that’s fucking retarded/illegal then they deserve a penalty just like every other person.
What I am sick of however is famous people getting off for shit they SHOULD get punished for, that’s what I’m sick of.
[quote=“ultradriver10000,post:33,topic:33196"”]
Just remember kiddies, ignorance is bliss.
[/quote]
[quote=“ultradriver10000,post:33,topic:33196"”]
If this upsets you, then just don’t do it personally, what give you the right to control others? I don’t like candy, should I prevent the entire world from eating it?
[/quote]
Last time I checked eating candy wasn’t illegal or inhumane, so that’s a shity analogy. Obviously no one was “controlling” Michael Vick when he was supposedly committing what he was indicted for, but it seems you’re implying he should be able to do whatever he wants without consequence? So hypothetically I should be aloud to kill my neighbor or something if I wake up and feel like it one day right?
For the rest of the stuff in this thread, most normal people don’t eat dogs (domestic pets) like they do livestock (cows, chickens etc). Therefore I would say I’m less sympathetic about something I eat and isn’t my personal domestic pet. But back to the main point eating livestock isn’t illegal like dog fighting is now is it?