Neil or kordell

[bics56]

@Cutty

my point… neil was more likey not to lose a game but less likely to able to win you a game. if neil didn;t have a great defense, steallar o-line and very good rb’s he would have seriously struggled. Neil was the jim mcmahon of the 85 bears…the weakest link. had the bears had a better QB that team may win 3 SB’s instead of just the won. same can be said with the steelers, Say maybe they had a Jim kelly, a warren moon…they win. Had Marino decided to leave miami like the steelers hoped in the early 90’s …they fucken destroy who ever they play.

I somewhat see your point, but in the end neil>Kordell…Kordell would find a way to lose you games. Kordell should have stuck with his roll as “slash” He was not an NFL QB by all means. And for a side not he loved a hot mancock in his mouth