Per CNN:
The Nobel committee recognized Obama’s efforts to solve complex global problems including working toward a world free of nuclear weapons.
“Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future,” the committee said.
Jagland said the decision was “unanimous” and came with ease.
Which is odd, because he didn’t accomplish much of that between Jan 20 and the nomination deadline of Feb 1…
And honestly, the Nobel Committee is being political about it:
He rejected the notion that Obama had been recognized prematurely for his efforts and said the committee wanted to promote the president just it had Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 in his efforts to open up the Soviet Union…
…Former Finnish President Martti Ahtisaari, last year’s laureate, said it was clear the Nobel committee wanted to encourage Obama on the issues he has been discussing on the world stage…
…The committee wanted to be “far more daring” than in recent times and make an impact on global politics, said Kristian Berg Harpviken, director of the International Peace Research Institute.
Personally, I think it denigrates the use of the Nobel, since the other times American Presidents have received it, they actually DID something - Theodore Roosevelt negotiated the end of the Russo-Japanese War, Wilson started the League of Nations; and Carter had worked around the globe for decades before receiving his.
And there can’t have been “too few other candidates”…
This year’s Peace Prize nominees included 172 people – among them three Chinese dissidents, an Afghan activist and a controversial Colombian lawmaker – and 33 organizations, the highest number of nominations ever.
So ultimately, the pressure will be on Obama to “live up to” the award. If he fails, then the award this year would be meaningless. And I’d bet that the award might actually backfire in certain cases - some of the governments he will have to work with won’t give a hoot what a Euro-centric award means.