…do not make female asses look good. Not that they make guys jeans like this…well I hope not. Ew.
I saw 3 girls wearing them today. Of course they were all ghetto, but come on. How can they look in the mirror while trying them on and think, “Thank god these pants make my ass look square!”
yeah, they really don’t help out the female booty
i mean you’d think it would, but no
EDIT: it’s so hot, milk was a bad choice
layzie
January 25, 2007, 8:28pm
4
i only see them on ghetto chicks and they usually have nice asses
Bacon
January 25, 2007, 8:34pm
5
It’s not so much as fashion as it is cost cutting. At least for the business end.
they just make a decent ass look disproportional. that’s it man, i’m anti-non-pocketed girl pants in '07
EDIT: the next person who quotes a damn picture gets cut
layzie:
GOOD
BAD
Holy weird shaped body. Are you sure you aren’t gay? :gotme: :shrug:
layzie
January 25, 2007, 8:46pm
9
the first girl is what i like to call…an apple bottom and id sink my teeth right into that
Anyway.
Those pants do not qualify. They have an internal pocket and a slit. We’re talking about zero pockets on the back.
my girls ass looks really good in the no pocket jeans so i dunno
layzie
January 25, 2007, 8:52pm
13
it depends on the girl…i see more ghetto chicks wear them then anyone
That’s a nice booty, Kevin. I would have to agree.
_nails
January 25, 2007, 8:53pm
15
.
I hate those jeans, they look like shit on the ghetto and non-ghetto variants.
Mr_T
January 25, 2007, 8:59pm
16
I wouldnt care what jeans this bitch has on as long as they come off, goddamn id love to chomp that apple.
ICK, give me the pancake but anyday, Thats too much ass for me
Old post but no pockets= :spunk:
These people clearly could not afford to buy the jeans with back pockets because they are poor and trashy.