WATER CONTAMINATION - BUFFALO NY

[

](http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20101220/ts_yblog_thelookout/study-tap-water-in-31-cities-contains-cancer-causing-chemical)http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20101220/ts_yblog_thelookout/study-tap-water-in-31-cities-contains-cancer-causing-chemical

31 cities’ tap water has cancer-causing hexavalent chromium, study says

By Brett Michael Dykes brett Michael Dykes – Mon Dec 20, 1:28 pm ET
http://l.yimg.com/lk/api/res/1.2/.mJj8edWsDmVnPbHZYxiww--/YXBwaWQ9eW1lZGlhO2g9NDE2O3c9MzAw/http://mit.zenfs.com/102/2010/12/AP090423022970.jpg

The Environmental Working Group released a report Monday indicating that millions of Americans are regularly drinking hexavalent chromium, made famous in the film “Erin Brockovich” as a carcinogen, through their tap water.

The group – whose study was first reported in a story Sunday by the Washington Post’s Lyndsey Layton – tested water from 35 U.S. cities and found that samples from 31 cities contained hexavalent chromium. The highest concentrations were found in Norman, Okla.; Honolulu; and Riverside, Calif. The substance had been a widely used industrial chemical for decades and has evidently leached into the groundwater in many areas.
[Related: Drilling ban follows concern over flammable water]
The EWG report states:

"Despite mounting evidence of the contaminant’s toxic effects, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not set a legal limit for chromium-6 in tap water and does not require [COLOR=#366388! important][FONT=arial]water [/FONT][FONT=arial]utilities[/FONT][/COLOR] to test for it. Hexavalent chromium is commonly discharged from steel and pulp mills as well as metal-plating and leather-tanning facilities. It can also pollute water through erosion of natural deposits.

“The authoritative National Toxicology Program (NTP) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has said that chromium-6 in [COLOR=#366388! important][FONT=arial]drinking [/FONT][FONT=arial]water[/FONT][/COLOR] shows ‘clear evidence of carcinogenic activity’ in laboratory animals, increasing the risk of gastrointestinal tumors. Just last October, a draft review by the EPA similarly found that ingesting the chemical in tap water is ‘likely to be carcinogenic to humans.’ Other health risks associated with exposure include liver and kidney damage, anemia and ulcers.”

[Related: Leaking ice raises tricky climate issue]

Drinking-water supplies all over the country are increasingly tainted by chemicals used in natural gas drilling. And Erin Brockovich, for her part, told the EWG that she’s rather astonished to find that hexavalent chromium is still a prospective health threat in so many communities.
[List: America’s most polluted cities]
“It is sometimes difficult to understand why I still have to warn the public about the presence of hexavalent chromium in drinking water 23 years after my colleagues and I first sounded the alarm,” Brockovich told the EWG. “This report underscores, in fairly stark terms, the health risks that millions of Americans still face because of water contamination.”
The list of cities found to have hexavalent chromium in the [COLOR=#366388! important][FONT=arial]municipal [/FONT][FONT=arial]water supplies[/FONT][/COLOR] are as follows:

• Honolulu, HI
• Bend, OR
• Sacramento, CA
• San Jose, CA
• Los Angeles, CA
• Riverside, CA
• Las Vegas, NV
• Salt Lake City, UT
• Scottsdale, AZ
• Phoenix, AZ
• Albuquerque, NM
• Norman, OK
• Omaha, NE
• Madison, WI
• Milwaukee, WI
• Chicago, IL
• Ann Arbor, MI
• Louisville, KY
• Cincinnati, OH
Buffalo, NY
• Syracuse, NY
• Pittsburgh, PA
• Villanova, PA
• Boston, MA
• New Haven, CT
• New York, NY
• Bethesda, MD
• Washington, DC
• Atlanta, GA
• Tallahassee, FL
• Miami, FL

EDIT: FU If it didn’t copy over perfect, it is readable, and if you have a problem click the link and fuck yourself. Thank you!

I guess the only thing that won’t cause cancer is sugar-free gum.

i dont drink tap water…it has fluoride in it and fluoride is very very bad for you :slight_smile:

I wonder how they decided which cities to test? Would also be nice to see some actual numbers to back up there point, although it wouldn’t surprise me if it was true.

Wow. I just watched the Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura on the Water Crisis so this is like 100x more scary.

I personally don’t think that as he said there is companies poisoning our water, I just think its probably common to have these chemicals in the water of any once heavily industrial region.

This is why I don’t drink it. The Fluoride is worse than most of the other 2400 chemicals in most drinking water.
Fluoride is poison no matter what your govt tells you.

Perhaps some of you guys with time on your hands could do some poking around and let us know if some or all brands of bottled water are processed in a manner that removes these harmful substances.

Do the Brita type charcoal home use filters actually remove flouride, hexavalent chromium, etc.?

Sometimes I wonder if any of this info really matters, seems like everything these days causes some sort of cancer. Some people smoke cigarettes and live to hundred years old. I wonder how much of this its really hype.

Pretty sure Aquafina is reverse osmosis which I have heard is the most effective. Then again, bottled water as a whole is full of contaminants from the plastic bottle alone they say.

Also, check out How do water contaminants related to health effects | APEC Water

if you scroll down to Cadmium its even common in refinery areas.

Corrosion of galvanized pipes; erosion of natural deposits; discharge from metal refineries; runoff from waste batteries and paints.

Come up to Rochester, our water is clean and safe :smiley:

You’re thread title is a bit reactionary. I’ve read this report and have a few issues with it.

First, the EPA doesn’t really have the tech to test for Chromium levels that low. So I tried to find out what method this group used to test with… but they don’t say.

Second, snazzy looking charts like the one below look great and stand out but fail to point out the obvious; .07 parts per BILLION gallons in Buffalo. BILLION. You have better chances at winning the lottery than drinking even a small amount of this stuff. Even in the higher level locations on this chart it’s going to be rare. The whole “Erin Brockavich” case was based off 580ppb in a small, easily assessed water source. The max here is 12.9ppb.

Third, Chromium is naturally occurring… especially at levels that low. And since their report doesn’t give a method or location for the tests I can’t say if it’s industrial or natural.

Forth, there have been zero studies of the effects on Chromium in water at these levels. How are you going to set a standard without knowing what’s harmful? Our bodies actually need Chromium-3 (this is Chromium-6) to assist our metabolism.

We drink crap every day. But we read crap too. I’ll hold judgment on if our water is “contaminated” with Chromium until there is a bit more information from this group, the EPA and heath research.

Well i feel better already!

The bottled water companies are putting a hit out on Onyx right now.

LOL @ the edit in the OP

---------- Post added at 10:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 AM ----------

haha

There’s probably some fine print somewhere that says “This study funded by Aquafina”

---------- Post added at 10:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 AM ----------

haha

There’s probably some fine print somewhere that says “This study funded by Aquafina”

josh…droppin’ science

Yeah this test is crap. Right off the executive summary:

EWG’s tests provide a one-time snapshot of chromium-6 levels in 35 cities.

ONE data point. ONE. ONE FUCKING DATA POINT. THIS FUCKING STUDY WOULDN’T PASS A HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE LAB! IT MEANS NOTHING! YOU CAN’T DRAW ANY CONCLUSIONS FROM ONE FUCKING SINGLE SOLITARY DATA POINT! GAH!

The “scientific” test report repeatedly refers to Chromium-6 as the Erin Brokovitch Chemical. So hmm, let’s see what kind of scientific foundation conducted this “study”. Oh, they’re an environmental lobby. Who would have thought? The full report of the study includes a section entitled “industry tactics.”

This is not science in any way shape or form. They simply did the bare minimum to be able to call their persuasive essay a “study.” This is politics.

Onyx -> :highfive: <- Fry

lol word

Ha! Buffalo is 0.07 and pittsburgh is 0.88. This shits probably mentally disabling them.

Thanks Onyx!