But drag is a product of the CD x frontal area. I bet the frontal area of the VW is at least three times that of the C6. So, in that case the VW would have ~400% more drag than the C6.
More examples of ACd ft²: [1]
- 5.10 - 1999 Honda Insight
- 5.71 - 1990 Honda CR-X Si
- 5.76 - 1968 Toyota 2000GT
- 5.80 - 1986 Toyota MR2
- 5.81 - 1989 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX
- 5.88 - 1990 Nissan 240SX
- 5.92 - 1994 Porsche 911 Speedster
- 5.95 - 1990 Mazda RX7
- 6.00 - 1970 Lamborghini Miura
- 6.13 - 1993 Acura NSX
- 6.17 - 1995 Lamborghini Diablo
- 6.27 - 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera
- 6.27 - 1992 Chevrolet Corvette
- 6.54 - 1991 Saturn Sports Coupe
- 6.40 - 1990 Lotus Esprit
- 6.57 - 1985 Chevrolet Corvette
- 6.77 - 1995 BMW M3
- 6.79 - 1993 Toyota Corolla DX
- 6.81 - 1991 Subaru Legacy
- 6.90 - 1993 Saturn Wagon
- 6.93 - 1982 Delorean
- 6.96 - 1988 Porsche 944 S
- 6.96 - 1995 Chevy Lumina LS
- 7.02 - 1992 BMW 325I
- 7.04 - 1991 Honda Civic EX
- 7.10 - 1995 Saab 900
- 7.14 - 1995 Subaru Legacy L
- 7.34 - 2001 Honda Civic
- 7.39 - 1994 Honda Accord EX
- 7.48 - 1993 Camaro Z28
- 7.57 - 1992 Toyota Camry
- 7.69 - 1994 Chrysler LHS
- 7.72 - 1993 Subaru Impreza
- 8.70 - 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo
- 8.70 - 1992 Ford Crown Victoria
- 8.71 - 1991 Buick LeSabre Limited
- 9.54 - 1992 Chevy Caprice Wagon
- 10.7 - 1992 Chevy Blazer
- 11.7 - 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
- 16.8 - 2006 Hummer H3
- 17.4 - 1995 Land Rover Discovery
- 26.3 - 2003 Hummer H2
copied from - Drag coefficient - Wikipedia
just to show you how much frontal surface area matters … along with overall size