http://www.fordvehicles.com/the2010mustang/?referrer=www.ford.com&glbcmp=ford|home
I’m not liking some aspects of the design. Maybe it will grow on me.
More here:
http://www.muscularmustangs.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=75
http://www.fordvehicles.com/the2010mustang/?referrer=www.ford.com&glbcmp=ford|home
I’m not liking some aspects of the design. Maybe it will grow on me.
More here:
http://www.muscularmustangs.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=75
Damn any way to get some pics up here, dont have flash at work
i watched the reveal on SPEED last night, it looks pretty good
I like the wheel choice, but the narrower overall design i do not like… Tail lights / Head lights…
That site is pretty sweet with the way they do the 360 degree angles…
I think it looks better than the current gen. :gotme:
I not a big fan of the looks of the new S197 stangs. Performance yes, they respond nicely to boost and H/C/I upgrades. Stock styling sucks on the Gts. cobra and aftermarket cars look good. Bullitt too.
that’s hot. great web site too.
Yeah, I have to agree. thought the sn95’s looked so much better
I do like the new headlight design of the 2010’s :tup: doesn’t look so bland anymore
Was it just a headlight change? it doesn’t look much different… The interior looks nice though.
you know the CTS-v is going to have much more horsepower. I see no point in getting a mustang when you can just get a CTS or CTS-V
the taillights and front bumpers look slightly different as well
apples to oranges??? 09 CTS-V is like 60K. A loaded GT is only 33. a Cobra is 45. For 60K your looking at a Gt500KR
Correct me if I’m wrong but is Ford coming out with a 4cyl Turbo Mustang??? I thought I heard that last week.
Doesn’t matter… Cadillac makes the best product ever. No apples to oranges. I see no point in buying a GT for 33 when you can have a CTS-V for just a little bit more saving.
I like it! Not as much as the fox body or sn95 style but i do like it
I believe its a Turbo v6, but I could be wrong. I believe it’s called the ecoboost engine?
I designed a few parts for that
meh… not as drastic a change as i expected.
OK if you see 27K as a “little bit more saving” :banghead:
I think you are missing the point. the 27K more is totally justified… its just that much better quality
Pictures ?
Added some to first post and a link to galleries