2015 VW GTI - APR numbers released.

Usually its hard to call a GTI impressive when it comes to straight line speed, but it definitely gets some credit for these numbers…

http://www.vwvortex.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/20_tsi_gen3_mqb_s0_vs_s1_93_cw.png

[TABLE=“width: 914”]
APR Acceleration Tests
[TH]Program Mode[/TH]
[TH]0-60 MPH[/TH]
[TH]0-62 MPH[/TH]
[TH]0-100 KPH[/TH]
[TH]0-100 MPH[/TH]
[TH]60-120 MPH[/TH]
[TH]62-124 MPH[/TH]
[TH]100-200 KPH[/TH]
[TH]60-130 MPH[/TH]
[TH]30-130 MPH[/TH]
[TH]1/4th ET[/TH]
[TH]1/4th Trap MPH[/TH]

[TR=“class: odd”]
[TH]Stock
93 AKI Octane[/TH]
6.932
7.242
7.266
14.983
15.872
18.968
Speed Limited
Speed Limited
Speed Limited
14.283
97.10
[/TR]
[TR=“class: even”]
[TH]APR Stage I
93 AKI Octane[/TH]
5.656
5.868
5.883
11.385
10.094
11.066
11.124
16.181
13.343
13.189
110.40
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Apparently they put the good stuff in and some slicks and ran a 12.6.

I’m impressed, FWD hatchback under 30K, runs low 13s with software.

Apr says 13.189 at 110.
Not too shabby for just a tune.

Based on my extensive internet racing and math, those numbers don’t add up.

A mid 5 second 0-60 running 13.1 1/4 must have a rocket that engages after 60 mph

I have been completely ignorant of GTIs. A couple recent articles have gotten my attention.

The GTI is as fast as a WRX in the twistys:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/hatchbacks/1407_comparison_four_fun_sporty_runabouts_under_30000/

I can’t find the original article that made this comparison. The GTI is slower than the old R32 and Golf R 0-60 and 1/4 mile, BUT, the GTI is faster everywhere else (real world, roll racing, off of a corner).

30 to 60: GTI 3.5s, R32 3.5s (draw), Golf R 4.0s
60 to 100: GTI 8.6s, R32 9.5s, Golf R 8.7s
100 to 120: GTI 7.7s, R32 9.2s, Golf R 8.5s
30 to 120: GTI 19.8s, R32 22.2s, Golf R 21.2s

GTI: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2015-volkswagen-gti-test-review-car-and-driver2015-volkswagen-gti-test-sheet.pdf
R32: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2008-volkswagen-r32.pdf
Golf R: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/2012-volkswagen-golf-r.pdf

I’m going to guess fwd & smart traction control is limiting 0-60? 60-110 is 7.5s …

They’re really bad at putting the power down stock, can’t imagine how much wheel spin you would have with an extra 100 ft lbs.

Im sure its tough to get going, but those aren’t the figures you’d normally see with a 13.1 @ 110mph car

I would have guessed a mid 4 0-60 if anything

110 trap is awesome… I’ll be interested to see what stage 2 gets.

my first gen direct inject FSI A3 with apr stg 2 (just an ebay downpipe and tune) went from 200/200 crank to 260/300 whp/tq and runs 14 flats… makes for a fun daily driver and gets 30mph highway… traction is always an issue down low, but I’m just used to waiting until the car is rolling before I punch it.

Just found this:

The DA was +1890 feet. It was horribly hot and humid.

60 foot was terrible. 2.298.

And this was also the non Performance Pack model. The PP gets you a bit more power stock, LSD and some bigger brakes at a minimum.

a real LSD?

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2015-volkswagen-gti-test-review

Damn. One of the things I dislike about my gti is that the “LSD” is just is applying brakes to the slipping wheel.

You must rip thought brake pads… Cause your wheels be spinning 24/7 in that rental…I mean lease

[The Performance Pack, a $1495 stand-alone option available on all trim levels and with both transmissions, adds an additional 10 hp, for 220 hp total, plus bigger brakes and, most notably, an electronically controlled, hydraulically actuated, torque-sensing, limited-slip front differential.]

:tup:

nice, about time.

if the standard GTI has these gains i wonder that the golf R and audi S3 are packing?

That’s pretty damn good.

I wonder if it has the K04 size turbo like my Golf R. I was at the track 2 weeks ago and was trapping 108 ish on a pretty hot day. That’s catless, with the stock K04 running 25lbs of boost. 12.9 @107.59 with a 1.8 60’ to be specific. (that’s in the top 20 on the Golf R 1/4 mile list, sad as it is) I’m guessing with more ideal conditions I could prob trap 110mph, but my car has the filter on a stick, catless downpipes and the Stage 2 tune.

X…

probably slightly better software and AWD. VW/audi undertune so their more expensive cars look better.

They should waaaaay under tune for better mpg and lower insurance, then you just call APR, etc. :slight_smile:

Sweet!

The new ones do not use KKK turbos amymore
They are IHI branded now. From what I hear similar in size to your turbo, slightly smaller.

wow, those are what stock and tuned v6tt awd s4’s run lol