Anyone ever sue a city before?

[theblue]

@torque77

look at the post above yours!!!

that’s really funny because the post above your one proves you wrong.

quoted law > “guessing” or whatever you did.

@El Pistolero

“Against this important interest we are asked to weigh the intrusion into the driver’s personal liberty occasioned not by the initial stop of the vehicle, which was admittedly justified, but by the order to get out of the car. We think this additional intrusion can only be described as de minimis. The driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his person than is already exposed. The police have already lawfully decided that the driver shall be briefly detained; the only question is whether he shall spend that period sitting in the driver’s seat of his car or standing alongside it. Not only is the insistence of the police on the latter choice not a “serious intrusion upon the sanctity of the person,” but it hardly rises to the level of a “petty indignity.'” Terry v. Ohio, supra, at 17. What is at most a mere inconvenience cannot prevail when balanced against legitimate concerns for the officer’s safety.” Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977)

Once an officer conducts a stop of a vehicle, the officer may also require the stopped motorist and even the passengers in the vehicle to leave the car. See also: Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997)

that’s what I was expecting